My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-01-14 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2024
>
2013
>
2013-01-14 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2013 10:06:08 AM
Creation date
4/2/2013 10:06:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
moratorium on deposits to the fund, a charter amendment set it at 1% and now itsset in stone at 2%. <br />This took effect on November 6, 2012. <br />Ms. Byrne Baber asked about the maintenance fund and how it’s going to work. Mr. Van Bergen <br />replied that Parks and Recreation will be handling that fund asthey already work with non-profits and <br />organizations under Friends of the Park. This allows them to have a budget to fund some of these <br />parks. Ms. Byrne Baber asked ifit’s only for lands purchased with the 2% fund. Mr. Van Bergen <br />replied yes. <br />Ms. Nicholsonasked for clarification on the status of properties on prioritized lists, what does it mean <br />when the status of some properties says not being pursued at this time. Mr. Van Bergen replied that <br />there are more properties that have resolutions and we don’t have enough funds. <br />Ms. Matsumura asked what is keeping the County from purchasing all of these properties. Mr. Van <br />Bergen replied that when you have limited funds you have toprioritize the acquisitions based on <br />leveraging funds with grants, a landownerwilling to sell, etc. <br />Ms. Nicholson asked if properties candrop off the list. Mr. Van Bergen replied that it doesn’t drop off <br />the list, it’s just not pursued. It’s an on-going list, and ifand when something becomes available for <br />purchase we can look into it. <br />OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL’S REPORT <br />Mr. Brilhante had nothing to report. <br />Ms. Nicholson asked that since we are losing two and getting two commissioners are we going to have <br />sunshine law training. Mr. Brilhante repliedyes. <br />CHAIRPERSON’S REPORT <br />Ms. Nicholson thanked Ms. Markovich for serving on the Commission and mentioned that we will be <br />getting two new commissioners starting at our next meeting. Mr. Brilhante added that once they get <br />confirmedand sworn in, they can start. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />Commission to review and revise Suggestion Form <br />Mr. Hirakami asked about the new council districts and how does it affect them now since it’s been re- <br />aligned. Does it change their representation of where they reside and who they represent. <br />Mr. Brilhante replied that because the district changed,the area of representation changes as well. <br />However underthe Charter, you can still holdover in the initial district that you represented and once <br />your term ends the new commissioner coming in willrepresent the new district. <br />Ms. Nicholson asked if they should clarify the council districts on the form. Mr. Brilhante noted that <br />the land district does not change like the political districts, it remains the same. <br />-3- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.