My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-02-07 Windward Transcript Glover
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2013
>
2013-02-07 Windward Transcript Glover
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2013 10:06:03 AM
Creation date
4/8/2013 10:06:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />LEITHEAD TODD: I do. <br /> <br />AU: Okay, please state your name and where you reside. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Bobby Jean Leithead Todd, Planning Director, Hilo. <br /> <br />BRILHANTE: Good morning, Commissioners, William Brilhante, Deputy Corporation Counsel, on <br />behalf of Ms. Bobby Jean Leithead Todd, Director, Hawai‘i County Planning Department. <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: I think what has been left out in some of this conversation is the fact that over the <br />years on several occasions the Land Use Commission has expressed their concern over what they view <br />as parceling out of applications to avoid having to go to the Land Use Commission. And in this case <br />what you have is not necessarily the applicant but you have the property owner who is successively <br />giving these, you know, licenses or permits out on a larger parcel, and then not master planning the <br />property, which is what the Land Use Commission would like to see. In Kona, we had a parcel that <br />was a 60-acre parcel that was subdivided into four slightly less than 15-acre parcels. Now those we <br />went ahead and did the rezoning applications on. But we had letters from the Land Use Commission <br />expressing their concern that the combination of subdivision of the land and then subsequent individual <br />applications within a close proximity of time in a matter of a few years looked like it was trying to <br />avoid going to the Land Use Commission, and that they have stated that, you know, we need to look <br />more closely at applications. And this precedes this application. <br /> <br />We have another application in another part of the island where there were two different applications <br />that were previously approved. When we looked at ongoing operations there, we basically told the <br />operators that because the two separate permits looked like they were utilizing the same 120 acres for <br />some of their joint activities that they should apply. And on our urging they are, in fact, applying to go <br />to the Land Use Commission to incorporate the larger parcel. So this is part of a pattern of our trying <br />to pay more attention to the concerns of the Land Use Commission. And there have been, you know, <br />phone calls, and emails over the years, and in letters that they’ve submitted. And they’ve also brought <br />this up when, you know, we’ve met with them in Honolulu to discuss -. They’ve ask staff for land use, <br />and for the Office of Planning -. <br /> <br />In this particular case, the applicant came to us before submitting an application and we urged them to <br />go to the Land Use Commission because of our concerns. So this was not a surprise to them. The <br />denial should not have been a surprise. Cause we, in fact, told them when they met us before <br />submitting an application that we believe that this should go to the Land Use Commission. Instead, <br />they decided to submit an application for a special use permit. We had raised these concerns. We, <br />because of the prior, you know, concerns we had from the Land Use Commission, staff decided that <br />they needed to call and make sure that we weren’t going to, you know, have a problem with the Land <br />Use Commission; and they sent their written, you know, confirmation that they had some issues. So as <br />a result of that we came with the recommendation that this be a denial. So this is not a surprise to the <br />applicant. This was one of the things that they knew could happen when they came to us. <br /> <br /> 6 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.