My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-12-06 Windward Transcript Connections
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2012
>
2012-12-06 Windward Transcript Connections
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2013 9:19:32 AM
Creation date
4/10/2013 9:19:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
they haven’t met with them. But if you could look at this packet that has been submitted to you, these <br />larger colored packets, this is information regarding the previous public community meetings, I’m <br />sorry, the previous community meetings, as well as one that they are scheduling on December 17, <br />2012. And so that information is right at the beginning of this packet. So that’s the third item that was <br />requested by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Along with these items the Planning Department has received letters of support, as well as this <br />morning we’ve received additional letters. I haven’t had a chance to go through them, but they have <br />been passed out to the Planning Commission. Lastly, we’ve received two letters from the applicant, <br />th <br />one dated November 16, and the second one dated December 5, 2012. The applicant is requesting a <br />th <br />continuance of this hearing matter. He has the reasons for their continuance on the December 5 letter. <br />It goes into the matter that the Planning Director spoke about earlier regarding representation from the <br />Attorney General’s Office. And with that, that concludes our presentation. Are there any questions? <br /> <br />AU: Any questions for staff? <br /> <br />ONO: I’m not very good at geo -. <br /> <br />AU: Microphone, Commissioner Ono, <br /> <br />ONO: Oh, I’m sorry. Would you kind of orient me on the map again. <br /> <br />DARROW: Sure. Okay, our subject property is identified with two black outlines. The property is <br />actually cut in half by Edita Street. Just for reference going through the middle of the map, we have <br />Kaumana Drive, the white line. As well as on the lower portion of the map, we have Puainako Street. <br />So this property falls in between these two main streets. Again, we have Edita, which would be <br />considered the primary access for the Kaumana, the Connections School. At this time, it appears that <br />the majority of structures would be located on the, what we consider the lower portion of the school. <br />The only thing that is proposed on the upper parcel is an elevated walkway that would be at least 100 <br />feet away from Kaumana Cave, which runs underneath a portion of the subject property. The different <br />colors on the map represents zonings. The subject property is zoned Agriculture 1-acre. The darker <br />yellow and the lighter yellow represent Residential zoning. The blue and the darker green represent <br />Agricultural zoning as well. <br /> <br />ONO: Excuse me. And the light green, is that the -? I’m really poor at judging. <br /> <br />DARROW: No problem. This area here, the subject property is light green, which is Agriculture <br />1-acre. <br /> <br />ONO: And that’s what they’re using -? <br /> <br />DARROW: Correct. <br /> <br />AU: Okay, Thank you. <br /> <br />DARROW: Thank you. <br /> 3 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.