2012-57.2 BRPDInitiatedRevocationSPP1122

Home

Communication No. 2012 -57.2 Based on Condition No. 8, the Planning Director initiated investigations into the alleged complaints. The following is a summary of the conditions that were not complied with and unpermitted activities that were verified through the investigations of the Planning Department staff. The results of these investigations were provided within each of the Notice of Non Compliance With Conditions issued to the applicant and are part of the exhibits above. 23. Condition No. lof Special Permit No. 1122: Condition No. 1 of Special Permit No. 1122 states "The applicant, successor or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all stated conditions of approval." When the Special Permit was approved, Condition No. 1 requires the applicant to take the responsibility for making sure they are in compliance with all stated conditions of approval, which has not been the case based on the information provided. 24. Condition No. 2 of Special Permit No. 1122: Condition No. 2 of Special Permit states "The project shall be developed in substantial compliance with representations made by the applicant." The applicant has not complied with this condition as there have been certain activities and improvements that were not represented as part of the original Special Permit application including, but are not limited to, the weekly farmer's market, swap meet, bazaars, jazz cafe, community movie nights, family parties and group events, weddings, music and public performance programs, and the construction of unpermitted dwellings /structures on the subject property. (Refer to Exhibit No. 2, which is the original Special Permit application) 25. Condition No. 4 of Special Permit No. 1122: Condition No. 4 of Special Permit No. 1122 states "The applicant shall secure building permits, for all existing farm dwellings /buildings, on the remainder of the property within one (1) year from the effective date of this permit." Although the applicant has received building permits for four (4) dwellings, a greenhouse, a garage /storage building and the performance art training pavilion, there have been numerous unpermitted structures built on the property. The following is evidence that documents non - compliance with this condition: a. A site inspection of the subject property was conducted on Thursday, February 11, 2010 by Zoning Inspector Scott Leonard. Inspector Leonard 12