Laserfiche WebLink
III. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS <br />A. Update EA with all missing information (see the State guidelines at <br />h of 20ocuments E ironmental Assessment ri i <br />e Kit D EA -FEA- Checklist. df ) and fully disclose all proposed activities and <br />anticipated impacts from the proposal to lease the State land and include the <br />P P P <br />proposal to amend the Special Uses permit. By including the request for an <br />Amendment to the Special Use Permit 1122 the community would have the <br />opportunity to comment on this and would be able to ascertain community benefits <br />(could include: use of proposed facilities, job creation, use of State land, and other <br />possibilities). Remove references to the 1998 EA and its associated actions (except <br />as introductory background material) as it is outdated information and should no <br />longer be considered relevant. <br />B. The major neighborhood concern is likely to be noise impacts. To reduce these <br />impacts look into noise abatement mitigation including, but not necessarily limited <br />to: installing soundproofing in all buildings that would generate noise (e.g. the <br />performance space, industrial arts center) and sound proof gravel road /driveways <br />through some road surface modification (paving or other). Once the Amended <br />Special Use Permit proposal is included there would likely be additional noise <br />mitigation recommendations from its proposed activities. <br />C. Develop a land management plan to provide for taking care of the 59 -acre parcel <br />(as was recommended by OHA in a letter dated February 10, 1998) including: <br />Habitat improvement /protection: To protect and enhance habitat for native birds, <br />revegetation and /or other habitat improvements of the site could be considered. <br />For example, native vegetation (described below) favored by the two native birds <br />seen during the original survey could be planted if found to be scarce. Also, the <br />Hawaiian hoary bat may be found on the site (the 1997 biological surveys only <br />included avian surveys) and as such may be able to benefit from management <br />activities as well. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Hawaiian Hoary <br />Bat Recovery Plan (1998) habitat loss is thought to be a factor in the bat's decline. It <br />further states that the availability of roasting sites is believed to be a major <br />limitation, along with other threats including pesticides, predation, prey availability <br />and roost disturbance, among others. They describe the usefulness of education <br />programs to inform the public along with other actions as beneficial to the bat. <br />Native birds in Hawaii have been shown to benefit by activities which improve their <br />habitat and increase their reproductive success (see below information from the <br />State of Hawaii's 2005 Wildlife Report), including: reducing the feral cat population <br />which can be facilitated through spaying and neutering, controlling the rat <br />population which could be assisted by traps or other methodologies, and by fencing <br />out wild pigs or other ungulates to protect native vegetation and reduce standing <br />water which breeds mosquitoes and leads to disease in bird populations. Some of <br />these measures may be worth considering on the 59 -acre State Land parcel to <br />0 <br />