|
and you can subdivide 25, but because we want the road a certain way or we have certain
<br />requirements, we try to accommodate it so that you can still get the 75 lots but it’s not necessarily
<br />each in a rectangle and it’s not necessarily the same size.
<br />
<br />Usually, and if I recall right, I think the one that was doing the rezoning, I think they were saying
<br />that they were going to come in for a P.U.D. at the time, because, I think when, the discussion was
<br />that it was clear that you couldn’t do the roads exactly the way the roads, you know, would lay out
<br />evenly, and I think the discussion occurred at the County Council that, you know, there was going
<br />to be some changes and they would be coming in, you know. I may be wrong but I thought that
<br />there was the discussion. Similarly, there is another scheduled, this one got withdrawn, but there is
<br />another rezoning in this area off of Hualālai Road where the landowner was going to come in for
<br />reclassification to Urban, rezoning, I think, to RS-10, and he was also very upfront about the fact
<br />that he was going to come in for a P.U.D., and has in fact met with the community. So it’s, you
<br />know, in a lot of these cases, when it closely follows a rezoning, I think the public is aware, and the
<br />Council is aware, that the applicant is coming in, because this guy, at least the one that I know on
<br />Hualālai Road, he’s been very upfront that that’s what his goal is, because he is trying to configure
<br />the lots.
<br />
<br />I think that frustration for, and possibly the fear, for people living in an area is if you are in an area
<br />that’s zoned RS-10 and next door it gets zoned RS-10, there is an expectation that the lots are going
<br />to be the same size as the lots in your subdivision. And the fear is that if the lots are smaller next
<br />door, that it’s going to impact your enjoyment of your property in a sense that it may lessen the
<br />value of your land, if the lots next door are smaller. People also get concerned about view planes,
<br />traffic, you know, and they also sometimes think that density is actually increasing in terms of, if
<br />they see a smaller lot, they are thinking that, oh, hey, he’s getting more than his 50 lots or he’s
<br />getting more than his 75. And it’s the concern that there is going to be an impact to you. Is my
<br />view plane impacted? Is my quiet enjoyment impacted? Is my property value impacted? I don’t
<br />know that that’s quantifiable. I don’t know if historically there is any evidence that having a P.U.D.
<br />next door in fact lowers your property value; but I know that that is frequently the concern of people
<br />in the community, and also whether it opens the door to further rezoning, further smaller lots, and
<br />so that what they thought they were buying into ends up not being what, you know, the community
<br />looks like they -. And so that’s some of the fear that’s driven. The one where we had the two-acre
<br />lots in the five acres, I think, you know, while there were concerns over other issues, I think it
<br />initially started with, hey, I bought into an area where it’s five acres, so the lots next door should be
<br />five acres, and, you know, he’s getting away with something because, without having to rezone the
<br />property, they are getting smaller lot sizes, so they are increasing density, even though it’s the same
<br />number of total lots. It’s the concern that what’s happening next door, that this isn’t what I moved
<br />into; I moved into Ag, I moved into Rural, I moved into a certain size. I don’t know how you can
<br />totally take care of that concern without just totally eliminating P.U.D.’s, because the P.U.D., as it’s
<br />set up, does allow for this shifting of the sizes and location. And in fact, the goal of the CDP is for
<br />us to try and do this more, not so much in the urban areas but in the rural areas, to try and preserve
<br />the open area and preserve ag land, because we have a lot of existing zoning, so -. I think there was,
<br />I’m trying to remember, there was one big P.U.D. we did where the zoning was like Ag-20, but it
<br />was several-thousand acres of land. And so the tradeoff on the P.U.D. was they got some smaller
<br />lots in one area in exchange for going from a 20-acre lot to like a 400-acre lot here, you know, a
<br />600-acre lot, I think one might be a 1,200-acre lot, and they can never subdivide the 1,200 acres,
<br />they can never subdivide the 400; but they did get in one area less then 20-acre lots. And so what
<br />they did is they looked at the total number of 20-acre lots that they theoretically could get, they
<br />11
<br />EXHIBIT A
<br />
<br />
|