My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-06-17 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-06-17 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2013 12:58:36 PM
Creation date
7/16/2013 12:38:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – June 17, 2013 <br />T. Lodge: Oh, Tom Lodge. Um, Palikapu, does that address the <br />leaving the animals because of helicopter shooting? <br /> <br />P. Dedman: Yes, it says it all in there, I think, about the pono about the <br />whole language of the bill was just because it was shooting <br />and letting it rot. It wasn’t necessarily that it was bad <br />shooting from the aerial, but the idea of what they did after <br />that was the strong language, in the bill about letting things <br />rot. <br /> <br />T. Lodge: Did it address at all, I mean like for example if I was… <br /> <br />P. Dedman: I would [unclear] Bill 261… <br /> <br />T. Lodge: If I, if we were, for example, hunting, and I shot an animal <br />and left it – would that apply to that also? <br /> <br />P. Dedman: I thought it was just the aerial. <br /> <br />T. Lodge: Right. So, we’re talking about… <br /> <br />P. Dedman: The aerial, but it’s just the practice of letting things rot – it’s <br />the language I think you should… <br /> <br />Woman: Because it’s food… <br /> <br />P. Dedman: Yeah, because it’s food. [Unclear] according to the County <br />Council. <br /> <br />D. Yoshina: So, I have a question. <br /> <br />Chair Sylvester Ike, state your name please… <br /> <br />D. Yoshina: Ike Yoshina, this Federal stipulation and this Federal court <br />case – that we just had – where they said that federal law <br />overrides the County Charter, etc., etc. How does that <br />impact this? Thank you. <br /> <br />B. Brilhante: Honestly, I’d have to go and read the actual holding of the <br />case – my understanding that there’s an issue regarding <br />preemption and the court ruled that because the area is so <br />closely regulated by the Feds or the State, to a certain <br />degree, the County’s adoption of that rule, which was in <br />contrast to the Federal and State regulations, would not be <br />enforceable pursuant to preemption doctrine – so, that’s my <br />understanding of it, but I don’t want to say specifically that is <br /> 27 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.