Laserfiche WebLink
talking about downsizing from originally 100 guests to 40 guests, is that part of the <br />recommendation that would be taking place? So would it be another, would it be a different project <br />than was originally approved? <br /> <br />ARAI: At this point, no. We are not considering the reduction in the scope of the project as <br />permitted by the special permit. The applicant has the luxury of opportunity to reduce the scope of <br />the project but still remaining compliant with the overall terms of the special permit that was <br />granted. Now, if the applicant was proposing something that expanded upon the scope of the <br />original use, then that definitely will have to be considered by the Planning Commission. Think <br />about it this way: the special permit defines the outer parameters of what the Commission allowed <br />back in 2000. If you don’t exceed those parameters, then you can downsize generally at will as <br />long as you don’t exceed the original scope. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Good. Any other questions? Director? <br /> <br />KANUHA: Daryn, maybe you can also clarify what happened with the approval of the plan <br />approval, and how they indicated some reduction in the density. <br /> <br />ARAI: Thank you, Mr. Director. In 2011 plans reflecting the one-third scale concept were <br />submitted to the Planning Department, and the Planning Department did issue final plan approval, <br />at the same time declaring that the reduced scope of the project remain in compliance with the <br />overall special permit. So the plan approval basically confirmed the continuing conformance of the <br />reduced project with the overall scope of the special permit. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Any other questions of Daryn? Hearing none, thanks, Daryn. Will the applicant or <br />representative of the application please come forward. Good morning. <br /> <br />YEH: Good morning. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Will you please raise your right hands. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this <br />matter now before the Leeward Hawai‘i County Planning Commission? <br /> <br />YEH: I do. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Beginning with you, Tom, will you please state your name and your position. <br /> <br />YEH: Thank you. My name is Thomas Yeh. I’m attorney representing Vipassana Hawai‘i, the <br />applicant. And then on my right is Sophia Schweitzer, Veronica Sophia Schweitzer; she is the <br />general manager of Vipassana. And she is here primarily to answer questions, if they do come up. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Great. Thank you for coming. Tom, did you want to give some general comments? <br /> <br />YEH: Yeah, I think it would just be helpful, you know, just from a background standpoint for the <br />Commission to understand, you know, who Vipassana is and what happened between 2000 and <br />now, which is a long time in some respects, but yet considering some of the things that have <br />transpired basically not. <br /> <br />First of all, Madam Chairman and Members of the Commission, thank you for considering this <br />application. I did want to thank staff for their very thorough background report and <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />