My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-06-21 Police Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Police Department
>
Police Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010 - 2015
>
2013
>
2013-06-21 Police Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2013 8:38:32 AM
Creation date
8/28/2013 8:29:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawai‘i Police Commission <br />Regular Session Minutes <br />June 21, 2013 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />reviewing the results of the survey. They are trying to categorize the different <br />comments, suggestions, or criticisms.When they are done with the analysis, he will <br />post them with his response. <br /> <br />Recess was called at 10:10 a.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:26 a.m. <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SESSION <br />Commissioner Schutte moved to meet in executive session to consider discipline and <br />charges against officers or employees of the Hawai‘i Police Department, to consider <br />sensitive matters relating to public safety, and to consult with Corporation Counsel on <br />questions and issues pertaining to the commission's powers, duties, privileges, <br />immunities, and liabilities pursuant to HRS 92-5 (a) (2) (4) (6) and the Hawai‘i County <br />Charter Section 13-20 (b). Vice Chair Ignacio seconded the motion, and it carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Executive session convened at 10:27 p.m. <br />Regular session reconvened at 1:21 p.m. <br /> <br />INVESTIGATION AND DELIBERATION OF COMPLAINTS <br />HPC 13-10: <br /> Complainant alleged that the manner in which officers logged evidence <br />was not right. <br /> <br />COMPLAINANT TIMOTHY SNEDEKER came before the commission. He stated that <br />he was a witness in this incident. When this happened, he took multiple pictures so he <br />could present it to the officers as evidence. He showed the photos to the officer. The <br />officer wanted the camera, but it was not his camera, so he gave him the sim card. He <br />is a suspect in the case. The officer logged the memory card as evidence. The officer <br />said it is a connect-up report. The memory card was not logged properly. It should <br />have been logged under the terroristic case, but the officer wouldn’t do it. If it is not <br />logged correctly, the prosecutor cannot refer to it.Officer Arnold took the evidence. He <br />never questioned him about the TRO violation. Officer Brodie gave him a hard time with <br />the memory card. His complaint is against Officer Arnold because he logged the <br />evidence against this case number. He wanted them to log the sim card appropriately. <br />The connect-up reports were not explained to him. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bertsch explained the connect-up reports to Mr. Snedeker. He read <br />excerpts of Police Report C13005842 “Connect-Up Reports” and explained the master <br />report and the connect-up reports. <br /> <br />Mr. Snedeker stated that the evidence does not justify the TRO violation charge. There <br />is no reason for the memory card to be logged under this number. <br /> <br />SHELLEY STEVENS came before the commission to speak on Complaint HPC 12-47. <br />She stated that the police department has to obey the laws of the land. The county is <br />not following the law. Regarding Ms. Morgan as a trespasser, criminal trespassing
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.