My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-07-15 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-07-15 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2013 10:20:37 AM
Creation date
9/17/2013 10:20:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – July 15, 2013 <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1. UPDATE ON HAWAII ADMINSTRATIVE RULE CHANGES TO CHAPTER <br />124 <br /> <br /> <br /> Chair Sylvester: Hawaii Administrative Rule Changes to Chapter 124. <br /> In response to public inquiry the GMAC would like to know if the Mayor would <br />generate a letter to the BLNR opposing the amendment changes to HAR-124. A <br />determination needs to be made to address what part or parts or in its entirety. <br />We need discussion and action. Since then, a draft letter was submitted by Vice <br />Chair Tom Lodge. <br /> <br /> Action: D. Yoshina motion to review the draft letter to BLNR opposing the <br />amendment changes to HAR-124, make changes if necessary, and submit to the <br />Mayor for his signature; Second by P. Bueltmann. Discussion: <br /> <br />T. Lodge read the draft letter. Letter must be specific and itemized. Clearly a “no” <br />vote by Mayor. It was determined that additional work needs to be done. <br /> <br />Action: D. Yoshina moved to table the draft letter for now; second by T. Lodge. <br />Motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> <br />W. Brilhante stated that there’s a provision in the Sunshine Law which affords for <br />situations, wherein a specific bill or be it a resolution or document was discussed <br />by the group, but there were amendments made or part throughout the <br />discussion or within the discussion, some outside viewpoints were brought into <br />the discussion and the Sunshine Law does afford for situations like that and the <br />requirement is - so long as the item that was agendized and the object that <br />you’re voting on – there was a sufficient nexus – is what the language states <br />between the two. <br /> <br />So here, when I read the agenda, the actual agenda item was that they wanted a <br />determination - to address what part or parts – a draft letter submitted by Vice <br />Chair Tom Lodge – that the chair hear a motion to review the draft letter, make <br />changes if necessary and submit to the Mayor for his signature. <br /> <br />So what I would propose is that, that language does seem sufficiently clear <br />enough as to what the intent – because the whole basis for the Sunshine Law is <br />you want to provide notice to the public as to what specific items or actions that <br />are being considered by the board – and here I think it’s clear that you want to <br />draft a letter opposing the amended changes to HAR-124 and have the Mayor <br />send that letter on behalf of the County to the BLNR for consideration, and I think <br />those components are sufficiently and clearly identified within the agenda. So I <br />think if this board takes action tonight to ratify or authorize the commission to <br /> 9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.