Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – July 15, 2013 <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1. UPDATE ON HAWAII ADMINSTRATIVE RULE CHANGES TO CHAPTER <br />124 <br /> <br /> <br /> Chair Sylvester: Hawaii Administrative Rule Changes to Chapter 124. <br /> In response to public inquiry the GMAC would like to know if the Mayor would <br />generate a letter to the BLNR opposing the amendment changes to HAR-124. A <br />determination needs to be made to address what part or parts or in its entirety. <br />We need discussion and action. Since then, a draft letter was submitted by Vice <br />Chair Tom Lodge. <br /> <br /> Action: D. Yoshina motion to review the draft letter to BLNR opposing the <br />amendment changes to HAR-124, make changes if necessary, and submit to the <br />Mayor for his signature; Second by P. Bueltmann. Discussion: <br /> <br />T. Lodge read the draft letter. Letter must be specific and itemized. Clearly a “no” <br />vote by Mayor. It was determined that additional work needs to be done. <br /> <br />Action: D. Yoshina moved to table the draft letter for now; second by T. Lodge. <br />Motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> <br />W. Brilhante stated that there’s a provision in the Sunshine Law which affords for <br />situations, wherein a specific bill or be it a resolution or document was discussed <br />by the group, but there were amendments made or part throughout the <br />discussion or within the discussion, some outside viewpoints were brought into <br />the discussion and the Sunshine Law does afford for situations like that and the <br />requirement is - so long as the item that was agendized and the object that <br />you’re voting on – there was a sufficient nexus – is what the language states <br />between the two. <br /> <br />So here, when I read the agenda, the actual agenda item was that they wanted a <br />determination - to address what part or parts – a draft letter submitted by Vice <br />Chair Tom Lodge – that the chair hear a motion to review the draft letter, make <br />changes if necessary and submit to the Mayor for his signature. <br /> <br />So what I would propose is that, that language does seem sufficiently clear <br />enough as to what the intent – because the whole basis for the Sunshine Law is <br />you want to provide notice to the public as to what specific items or actions that <br />are being considered by the board – and here I think it’s clear that you want to <br />draft a letter opposing the amended changes to HAR-124 and have the Mayor <br />send that letter on behalf of the County to the BLNR for consideration, and I think <br />those components are sufficiently and clearly identified within the agenda. So I <br />think if this board takes action tonight to ratify or authorize the commission to <br /> 9 <br /> <br />