Laserfiche WebLink
<br />39 <br /> <br />40 <br />Bo noted that the completion of the highway is paramount to the safety of our community. Summary <br />41 <br />presentation by Roy Siegel: <br />42 <br />Design-Build contract with the design phase complete, <br />· <br />43 <br />Waiting to get Section 4 F Evaluation approved (US Dept. of Transportation Act that is <br />· <br />44 <br />determinative) <br />45 <br />Need data recovery approved by SHPD, <br />· <br />46 <br />Redesign of the highway changed the data recovery plan with SHPD. This triggered redesign, <br />· <br />47 <br />resubmittal and reapproval. Time lost. <br />48 <br />Questions from the National Park Service for noise and noise impacts, <br />· <br />49 <br />All of these items need to be resolved before Section 4 F can be approved, <br />· <br />50 <br />Then data recovery plan goes to SHPD then grading permits. <br />· <br />51 <br />Funding will not go away for the Federal money. <br />· <br />52 <br />Other road improvements were discussed. Bo mentioned that this was his committee report. <br />53 <br /> <br />54 <br />BUSINESS OF COMMITTEE <br />55 <br />Judiciary letter: discussion followed about the letter and discussion followed. <br />56 <br />Terry mentioned that the Planning Department issued a letter on critical habitat and copies were <br />57 <br />distributed to all action committee members. Ken Melrose mentioned that the Judiciary site would <br />58 <br />serve as part of the Civic core for this TOD at the West Hawaii Civic Center. <br />59 <br />Terry clarified that the letter from the action committee needs to go the planning director for review <br />60 <br />and if approved, it would be forwarded to the appropriate address. The question is whether the action <br />61 <br />committee remains intent on sending a letter in light of all decisions made by the Judiciary on site <br />62 <br />selection and if so, are the contents of the current letter appropriate? <br />63 <br />Letter is tabled until the next meeting. <br />64 <br /> <br />65 <br />Terry gave out a list of duties and responsibilities for action committee members. <br />66 <br /> <br />67 <br />Chapters 23 & 25 are still under review by the Planning Department. Ken Melrose stated that Kailua <br />68 <br />related issues can be addressed. Ken addressed the Kailua Improvement District and the relationship to <br />69 <br />the existing Kailua-Kona RCDs. <br />70 <br /> <br />71 <br />Discussion of mission statement goals and objectives of each sub-committee with the approval of the <br />72 <br />action committee was also addressed. Action items from the back of the CDP were distributed to each <br />73 <br />member of the action committee for each member to review and be ready to discuss. Greg is challenging <br /> 2 <br /> <br />