My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013 Peer Review
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Peer Review
>
2013 Peer Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2013 8:11:34 AM
Creation date
12/26/2013 8:06:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County of Hawai’i <br />Office of the Legislative Auditor <br />December 1 2 , 2013 <br />Page 3 <br />documented in any o f the working papers of the three audits completed during the review <br />period. <br />We recommend the Office of the Legislative Auditor document the supervision provided <br />during audi t engagements. <br />GAS 6. 69 requires auditors to “perform and document an overall assessment of the <br />collective evidence used to support findings and conclusions, including the results of any <br />specific assessments conducted to conclude on the validity and relia bility of specific <br />evidence. ” For the three audits completed during the audit period, none contained <br />documentation of an overall assessment . <br />We recommend the Office of the Legislative Auditor document its overall assessment of the <br />collective evidence use d to support finding and conclusions . <br />GAS 7.13 requires “in reporting audit methodology, auditors should explain how the <br />completed audit work supports the audit objectives, including the evidence gathering and <br />analysis techniques, in sufficient detail to allow knowledgeable users of their reports to <br />understand how the auditors addressed the audit objectives.” For the three audit s <br />completed during the review period, the audit reports did not detail how the work performed <br />supported the audit objectives. <br />We recommend the Office of the Legislative Auditor expand the methodology section of its <br />audit reports to include how the work supports the audit objectives. <br />GAS 7.30 requires “when auditors comply with all applicable GAGAS requirements, they <br />should use . . . an unmodified GAGAS compliance statement, in the audit report to indicate <br />that they performed the audit in accordance with GAGAS.” For the three audits completed <br />during the review period, GAGAS compliance was not cit ed in one report and the <br />standardize d language GAGAS compliance statement w as modified in the other two. <br />We recommend when the Office of the Legislative Auditor complies with all the applicable <br />GAGAS compliance requirements, it use the standardized language of the unmodified <br />GAGAS complianc e statement. <br />We extend our thanks to you, your staff and the other c ounty officials we met for the hospitality <br />and cooperation extended to us during our review. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Gary S. Chapman, CIA, CGAP, CFE Mary Jo Emanuel e , CIA, CGFM <br />S enior Auditor Audit Manager <br />City of Tampa, Florida City of Kansas City, Missouri <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.