My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-12-11 Board of Ethics minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2013
>
2013-12-11 Board of Ethics minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2014 3:09:21 PM
Creation date
1/8/2014 1:49:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
part of the idea, the reason that we have identified—the reason not that we have identified, but the reason that the Code identifies real estate appraisers as regulatory employees that are subject to this Code, is because they have the kind of authority where financial interests are involved. And so we have this situation, it seems to me, where you have a job to do but we have the Code to interpret. And as I’m listening to the processes, all well intentioned, that are being explained here, it seems to me that we still—there’s a gap here, it seems to me. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: Any questions? <br /> <br />MR. HISASHIMA: No. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: Any comments at this time? How about just general comments on where we want to proceed from here. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: I think we—I would like to make a motion that we move this into the next hearing level, to make it into a formal hearing for next time and ________ move it to the next level. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: There’s a motion to take this into a formal hearing. <br /> <br />MR. ADAMS: I second. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: Any discussion on the motion? <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: The reason I want to do that is because when we come back again, I want some clarification from the department on how they read the concept of en masse as to being directly affecting—also as to your statement about moving, every time you move you’d have to change—remember, there’s two things involved here. There’s direct action and there’s substantial interest, so if you move, it doesn’t matter where you move to if you don’t have a substantial interest in that place that you move to. You understand what I mean? So it’s only if you have a large interest in that home you’re in that we’re concerned about, that you have that _________. So it’s not just moving around that makes a difference--it’s whether you have that substantial interest that makes a difference. So if you’re renting someplace, don’t worry about the County Code and living there. It doesn’t matter. But if you’re living there and you have a—you build up an equity, then you’re starting to talk about substantial interest in that area that you’re in, and that would cause a problem. And that’s what we want to look at the next time. <br /> <br />MS. CRAWFORD: If I can ask for clarification— <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: Right. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.