Laserfiche WebLink
hearings, just so that it’s more of a formal type hearing, following Chapter 91 in terms of having people represented, the issues being specific. <br /> <br />MR. ADAMS: If I may, in our rules as well, it does indicate that at our discretion we may determine that we are in fact the complainant, or may become a co-complainant, which may take some of the onus off of the current petitioner and place it more on us as needing to find the information. <br /> <br />MS. SCHOEN: I don’t disagree with—I mean yeah, it does say that in 6.2. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: All right, I don’t care what kind of hearing we call it. It doesn’t make any difference to me. If we can make a finding at the next hearing, I’ll call it informal— <br /> <br />MR. ADAMS: --I think the point of all that was we want to make sure we’re going to get the information that we want. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: Right. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: Yeah. And I believe that we’ve discussed specifically the kind of information that we want to get into and discuss. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: And if we can make a finding of guilt at that particular time, a finding of a violation at that particular time, at an informal hearing, I’ll just _____ informal hearing. Is that all right? <br /> <br />MR. ADAMS: You can do whatever you’d like, Judge. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: Exactly. Does that make you happy? <br /> <br />MS. SCHOEN: Yeah, I’m fine. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: Okay, let’s make a motion to go another informal hearing, to make further—to take further information from the parties involved. <br /> <br />MR. ADAMS: Is that an amendment of the current one? <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: Yes. <br /> <br />MR. ADAMS: And since I gave the second, then I’d be happy to second that amendment. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: All those in favor? <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS, MR. ADAMS, and MR. HISASHIMA (simultaneously): Aye. <br />