My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-11-07 Windward Transcript -Greenlaw
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2013
>
2013-11-07 Windward Transcript -Greenlaw
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2014 10:00:27 AM
Creation date
1/13/2014 9:59:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Now this is the structure that the applicant removed. They were using it to store their trucks. So <br />that has since been removed. <br /> <br />The Director is recommending approval of the request for the satellite learning and education <br />center with the conditions that we provided to you; and the Director is recommending denial of <br />the request for the water catchment and pool services use. And the reason that’s, the denial, the <br />request we’re recommending denial on is because it’s not consistent with the General Plan and the <br />Puna CDP. This is similar to the Diamond special permit that the Commission just reviewed. <br />These are the same reasons basically, that we’re encouraging or recommending based on the plans <br />rd <br />that light industrial businesses be located along 33 Avenue. The clientele for this particular <br />business is more of a regional-serving business. It’s not just focused on Hawaiian Paradise Park <br />residents. And, as I mentioned, both plans recommend locating light industrial uses that serve a <br />rdrd <br />regional purpose onto 33 Avenue. One of the main reasons is that 33 Avenue is paved so it can <br />th <br />handle the truck traffic; and 19 Avenue is not, it’s a gravel road as you saw. <br /> <br />th <br />And you did receive in your package, there was one letter from a resident that lives on 19 <br />Avenue that did have concerns with the paved road because of dust and wear and tear. And <br />that’s the end of my presentation. <br /> <br />I do want to bring your attention to some correspondence that we received this morning. You <br />should have two letters from John Rossette, one letter from Council Member Zendo Kern, one <br />letter from Dave Koch, a letter from Catherine Akerberg, a letter from Senator Russell Ruderman. <br />th <br /> And from the applicant’s representative Ted Hong you should have a letter dated October 28 <br />with responses to agencies comments. And this morning you should have received a packet that <br />looks like this. This was also submitted by the applicant’s representative Ted Hong, with <br />additional letters of support, as well as conditions that he’s recommending should the Commission <br />decide to approve the water catchment tank business. Are there any questions? <br /> <br />ISHIBASHI: Did they remove the garage? <br /> <br />COTTLE: They removed one of those structures. One of the two structures that was being used <br />for the water catchment tank business has been removed. <br /> <br />ISHIBASHI: What about the tanker? Where are we at with the water tank? <br /> <br />COTTLE: The water tank, I’m not sure. We would have to ask the applicant. <br /> <br />ISHIBASHI: Okay. Thank you, Maija. Any questions, Commissioners? <br /> <br />GONZALES: I have a question, Mr. Chairman. <br /> <br />ISHIBASHI: Go ahead, Commissioner Gonzales. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Maija, okay, so these are the conditions for the school? <br />4 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.