|
<br />FUKE: You’re the Planning Director. I’m only kidding. I would think like in years past, like this
<br />similar kind of concern was raised. There was a resolution that was passed by the County Council
<br />I think at one point in time that the area be, a certain portion of house lot the General Plan be
<br />amended. And so if I recall correctly, and I’m not really testing too much my memory now, but
<br />then that whole area, the existing General Plan is, you know, is what was like way back when.
<br />And then because of the concerns raised by a number of residents, you know, about
<br />commercializing of that area then the Council passed a resolution. And then the General Plan was
<br />amended to create like only certain areas to be set aside for Industrial, certain areas were going
<br />to, I think like this pocket of the Waiākea House Lot area was going to be kept in Low Density
<br />Residential. And then in the most recent General Plan Amendment it went through the review,
<br />then it went back to the old, you know, the original map. I mean generally I think that’s how I
<br />kind of understood. So the short answer to your question, Mr. Director, is probably, again, like if
<br />the members wish, if the residents in that area wished to not see any commercialization in that
<br />area, the best bet would probably be to petition the Council again and to ask that the General Plan
<br />for this area be amended from Medium Density to Low Density. But as long as you have the
<br />Medium Density area, subject to infrastructural issues, you know, probably as in this case here,
<br />you know, you would lend support for a Neighborhood Commercial zoning, but definitely not
<br />Industrial.
<br />
<br />ISHIBASHI: Any further questions, Commissioners? Go ahead, Commissioner Moses.
<br />
<br />MOSES: Chair, you know, I see the memorandum from the Department of Public Works; and in
<br />that they comment for our consideration that street light and traffic control devices may be
<br />required. And as we heard from the residents that this is really a need, and your applicant also
<br />sees that. So are we able to put that as part of a condition, you know, moving forward any type
<br />of approval pertaining to zoning in this area with the agreement, of course, of the Traffic Division,
<br />Department of Public Works?
<br />
<br />FUKE: I think that if you look at the staff’s proposed Condition E it already requires that the
<br />applicant provide an additional five-feet section, five-foot section fronting his property, her
<br />property, and constructing curbs, gutters and sidewalks. Of course it’s not going to stretch the
<br />entire length of Laukapu Street cause no individual property owner can do that. But in this
<br />situation here there’s an incremental improvement, you know, like a “fair share system” where she
<br />would be responsible in providing that curb, gutter and sidewalk system.
<br />
<br />The traffic light system what I understood Public Works was referring to was not like signalized
<br />but then if there’s a need when you put in your curb, gutter , sidewalk for like a street lamp in that
<br />particular area, then that’s also part and parcel of that whole requirement.
<br />
<br />ONO: Mr. Chair, question? Chair?
<br />
<br />ISHIBASHI: Go ahead, Commissioner Ono.
<br />
<br />9
<br /> EXHIBIT A
<br />
<br />
<br />
|