My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-10 Bath-AC connectivity
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Pre-2018 Files
>
Communications to AC
>
2014
>
2014-10 Bath-AC connectivity
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2014 11:20:45 AM
Creation date
2/12/2014 11:19:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The PREP fairs have produced data <br />that people overwhelmingly want CL in Puna. <br />This included folks from HPP. There was not one person opposing it. <br />Still, dialogue is not occurring to its full potential at the AC level. It is hopeful that at least two of <br />you will "champion" this issue. I am hopeful that personal desires do not get in the way of <br />implementation of the plan. <br />As you are aware there is a well prepared implementation timeline at the back of the PCDP <br />document. <br />Lets start collaborating with the sited departments and agencies such as PW and HDOT as we <br />move forward. <br />Resources <br />I am hopeful that with this new AC group that copies of the PCDP will be at every public <br />meeting as requested NUMEROUS time in the past. <br />I am hopeful that a copy of the supportive PCDP documents submitted to the County by Plan <br />Pacific will be available at AC meetings for the public to have general access to. If this is not <br />possible having hard copies in libraries and the planning office, an creating a place where the <br />public can sit and have access to read them would be helpful and might engage more people. <br />(Yes I am aware of their size.) <br />What good are these documents if they are stored in a box some where at planning? They <br />reflect the history and foundation of the process. I am not speaking solely of the working group <br />reports. <br />Please keep in mind that although you may have access, resources and time to access CDP <br />things on the web, most I speak with do not or have tried and gave up. <br />Access to these documents is especially important for those arriving later. For example was this <br />committee, particularly those who are newer to the process .aware of the documents I speak <br />of? I am sure that Larry Brown will be happy to route you to them and make them available so <br />that you can implement this plan in the spirit and with the intent in which it was created. They <br />are evidence of the foundation of the plan that we are building upon. <br />Criteria for CL <br />I request that the public criteria always be put above County in any print. <br />Additionally I discourage the bold font being used to highlight county criteria points unless the <br />public criteria is also bold. It focuses to much on County. <br />This is the peoples plan. The paradigm needs to shift away from County being the one who <br />dictates to us and to a more community centered base.The County is here to serve us not tell us <br />how tax dollars will or will not be routed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.