My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-08-28 Minutes Salary Commission
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-08-28 Minutes Salary Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2014 4:18:28 PM
Creation date
2/26/2014 4:18:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission August 28, 2013 <br /> you this—it's a great experience working with the people on the <br /> Subcommittee. And, basically, if I wanted to give everybody a raise, this <br /> would have been your chance, but—sorry, I couldn't do that for anybody and <br /> neither could anyone of us. <br /> And, as far as finding the money out there, it's going to be out there. You <br /> watch. Somebody's going to pop up with—there's some extra money to pay <br /> these people—and it'll happen. <br /> So, basically, for the benefit of my fellow Commissioners—as well as you in <br /> the public—I'd like to provide a little context for the recommendations that <br /> we all made. <br /> Back in February, we started an investigation subcommittee consisting of <br /> Commissioners Sumj a—to my left—and Commissioner Stroh—to my right. <br /> And the task was reviewing the current salaries of the executives and elected <br /> officials, and making recommendations for adjustments. And, we worked <br /> really hard at that. And, remember now, we are just a volunteer team that <br /> comes on board and looks at figure after figure—and we really don't know <br /> anybody and, personally, it was easy to work with because we didn't know <br /> who the people were. Well, some of us did—but we didn't, definitely, know <br /> who was getting what—where, until we worked at this. <br /> And at the March Salary Commission,the Subcommittee made <br /> recommendations for salary increases all across-the-board. These <br /> recommended increases would have amounted to a total of$224,000. Then, <br /> in April, after some discussion amongst the Commissioners and after <br /> receiving input from the public as well as from the Administration,the <br /> Commission decided it would be premature to take action on the proposed <br /> increases at this time. And the Subcommittee was tasked with revisiting and <br /> possibly readjusting the previous developed recommendations. <br /> Following that meeting in April, the Subcommittee did meet and we put <br /> together the recommended salary adjustments that are being presented to you <br /> today. You can see that we have narrowed the recommended increases to <br /> apply to just 13 positions at a total amount of$149,000 as compared to the <br /> previous $224,000. <br /> A significant consideration in targeting these particular positions for salary <br /> increases was to address the problem of salary inversion or a subordinate <br /> making more than the department heads and deputies. And you can see on <br /> the table we put together—there's a column that indicates a highest <br /> subordinate salary. You all have a copy of that(SEE ATT. C). You must be <br /> very busy reading. <br /> Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.