My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-12-12 Minutes Salary Commission
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-12-12 Minutes Salary Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2014 10:27:09 AM
Creation date
2/27/2014 10:27:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission December 12, 2013 <br /> Ms.Nitahara stated that she also updated their booklet with"Exhibit 6" entitled, <br /> "Comparison of Executive Pay Rates for State and Counties" (SEE ATT. B) and <br /> "Exhibit 7" entitled, "Comparison of County Department Data and Resident <br /> Population" (SEE ATT. C)that contain the new changes in salaries, which can be <br /> compared with the salaries of other jurisdictions. <br /> Mr. Hermes directed the Commissioners attention to the document entitled, <br /> "Comparison of Executives and Subordinates Salaries" (SEE ATT. D). He stated <br /> that they examined the highest paid subordinate in each department and mapped <br /> out their anticipated salary at certain points in the future as it relates to the existing <br /> collective bargaining agreements—most of which go through June 30, 2017. <br /> Mr. Hermes explained the methodology of the information. Every subsequent <br /> dollar value that they see is a function of the subordinate, and it is the function of <br /> an executive order that mirrors a collective bargaining agreement, and that the <br /> increase in salary is governed by the collective bargaining agreement. As an <br /> example, referencing the "Director of Human Resources,"under the "Highest Paid <br /> Subordinate"the column with the date "07/01/14"—the employee would receive <br /> $94,386 at that time. For clarification purposes,the Director of Human Resources <br /> salary is $99,000 and the highest paid subordinate's salary on July 1, 2014 would <br /> be $94,836. <br /> Ms. Stroh compared the salaries of the police chief and fire chief and inquired why <br /> there wasn't an adjustment to the fire chief's salary in January 2014. <br /> Mr. Hermes stated that recently there's been an arbitrator issue regarding the <br /> decision and award for the fire interest arbitration where there are increases <br /> associated with that. In general,there's a 4% increase with step movement for <br /> three years; and on the fourth year,there's a 5% increase with step movement(not <br /> compounding), and it's roughly a 17% increase in base salary over a period of four <br /> years. <br /> Mr. Hermes pointed out that now the fire chief's salary has been tied to the police <br /> chief's salary and, at this time, any increase in the highest paid subordinate in the <br /> Fire Department would not reach the level of the fire chief. <br /> Mr. Hermes stated that another reason that the highest paid subordinate salaries for <br /> the fire chief was not included is because the cost items of the arbitration decision <br /> needs to be approved by all legislative bodies in the respective counties in order <br /> for the cost items to be official. Given the timing and because the State does not <br /> employ any firefighters, we would need to wait until the next legislative session, <br /> and anticipate that it will become official sometime in April/May, in which case, <br /> there will be some retroactive actions occurring at that time. <br /> Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.