Laserfiche WebLink
executive session. A voice vote was taken of all Commissioners present, and motion carried <br />with seven aye votes. <br /> <br />The hearing reconvened for regular session at 12:35 p.m. <br /> <br />The discussion on Item No. 6 (Planning Director Initiated regarding non-compliance with <br />Condition No. 8 and to assess compliance with other conditions of USE 12-000034) ended at <br />12:42 p.m. <br /> <br />The discussion on Item No. 7 (Regency South, Amend USE 12-000034) ended at 12:45 p.m. <br /> <br />MINUTES <br /> – The Commission took this item up at 12:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes of the March 6, 2014 meeting – It was moved by Commissioner Moses, <br />and seconded by Commissioner Ishibashi, that the minutes of March 6, 2014 be approved as <br />circulated. Motion was unanimously carried by a voice vote of all Commissioners in attendance. <br /> <br />ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS/ANNOUNCEMENTS <br /> – The Commission took up the <br />following at 12:46 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />1.Status of applications heard by Windward Planning Commission that are pending before <br />County Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Arai did not have anything to report on the status of applications that are pending before the <br />County Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Arai updated the Commission on the status of the Connections (SPP 12-000138) contested <br />case proceedings. The contested case hearing has concluded as previously reported, and the <br />hearings officer is in the process of preparing her draft Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and <br />recommendation that will be offered to the Planning Commission. It is hoped that the Findings <br />will be submitted sometime next week to all of the parties at which time they will be afforded the <br />opportunity to provide their Exceptions. The material will be provided to the Commission prior <br />st <br />to the May 1 hearing on this matter. Mr. Arai added that the May meeting will be a full day, <br />with the possibility of nine separate items tentatively scheduled. Mr. Arai said that there were no <br />further announcements at this time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Henkel asked what was the status of an alternate Building Code at the County <br />Council and if the Planning Department had a position or opinion on that. Mr. Arai stated that he <br />was not aware of an alternative Building Code at the County Council. <br /> <br /> <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />Windward Planning Commission <br />April 3, 2014 Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />