Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. ADAMS: Aye. <br /> <br />MR. HISASHIMA: Aye. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS and MR. BALSIS (simultaneously): Aye. The motion’s been passed that <br />there has been a violation in the Ethics Code. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: All right, I’d like to make a further motion. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: Go ahead, motion. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: I’d like to make a further motion. I move that there be no sanctions <br />taken against the employee by this Board, because it was a policy decision of the <br />employer. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: I second that motion. Any discussion? <br /> <br />MR. HISASHIMA: Hang on. Does the Board have the right to sanction, or do we send it <br />to appointing authority? <br /> <br />MS. SCHOEN: Usually the Board will issue their opinion and forward it to the petitioner, <br />the respondent, and the appointing authority. <br /> <br />MR. HISASHIMA: Who is the appointing authority? <br /> <br />MS. SCHOEN: In this case, for this employee, it would be the Director of Finance. So the <br />Board doesn’t itself issue— <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: --All right, then I’ll rephrase the motion. I move that we recommend no <br />sanctions be taken against this employee, because this was a policy decision and not an <br />employee decision. <br /> <br />MR. HISASHIMA: Second. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: Any discussion on that motion? <br /> <br />MR. ADAMS: Yeah, just a question. Do you want to add anything to that in terms of <br />recommending to the department— <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: No, I think they ______. But I think you should say what you were <br />going to say, though. <br /> <br />MR. ADAMS: That’s what I was going to say. <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />