My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-03-06HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-CELLCO DBA VERIZON USE 14-046
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2014
>
2014-03-06HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-CELLCO DBA VERIZON USE 14-046
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 3:21:14 PM
Creation date
5/29/2014 3:21:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The Planning Director is recommending that the Planning Commission approve this request with <br />conditions. I do have a few bits of information I need to bring to the Commission’s attention <br />regarding this application. We have received several letters since the Background and <br />Recommendation was submitted to the Planning Commission. One is a letter dated January 31, <br />2014, from Dayne and Shari Shinsato. This is a, an opposition letter that you should have all <br />received, and we’ve also received a comment letter from the Department of Public Works dated <br />rd <br />February 3, 2014. There is one correction I need to make on the record. Unfortunately, some <br />times, we cut and paste and we miss something. This would be on Page 4 of the <br />Recommendation. On the, in the second paragraph, 1-2-3-4, line number 5, it says the tower site <br />is located on a small portion of a 5.371 acre property. If that line can be deleted. The property is <br />8,100 square feet which is identified at the lower portion of the page. <br /> <br />And then lastly, the Planning Department has received a Petition for Standing in a Contested <br />th <br />Case from Daryl Inaba. This was received on February 28, Friday. There is a question whether <br />or not the request is considered timely. In our Planning Commission rules, Rule 4-6, 4-6a, it <br />says that the petition needs to be submitted prior, before seven days before the Planning <br />Commission’s first hearing on the matter. So, when we look at it being submitted on Friday, <br />we’ll count Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, the date of the <br />hearing would be the seventh day, so it’s going to be up to the discretion of the Planning <br />Commission to consider standing in this regards. They did submit the $200 filing fee, so other <br />than that, everything’s in order with the petition. With that, that concludes our presentation. Are <br />there any questions? <br /> <br />GONZALES: Questions for staff? <br /> <br />DARROW: Thank you. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Thanks Jeffrey. I’d like to call up the applicant, please. Good morning. <br /> <br />MARTIN: Good morning. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Can you raise your right hand, please? <br /> <br />MARTIN: Yes. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Do you swear to tell the truth before the Windward Planning Commission today? <br /> <br />MARTIN: Yes, I do. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Thank you, go ahead. <br /> <br />MARTIN: My name is Danette Martin. I work as a consultant with Verizon Wireless, and I was <br />tasked with trying to locate this tower, and I realize from the comments that people, you know, <br />that you made with the previous application, that there’s some concern about the siting for this <br />one, and I wanted to answer your question more directly on how far do these towers really go. <br />Well, when we first started back in the analog days, they were, they went 20 miles. And then, <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.