Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WHITMORE: Yes, after about six years, you would have to begin initiating the next <br />comprehensive update, yes. <br /> <br />ONO: Ok, part of the proposal then you’re suggesting that we do a complete ten year and then <br />we begin to initiate a, certain changes, as suggested changes, which would then move the time <br />table for the first plan, actually to about 15 years because the original plan would stay in place <br />while all of these proposals take place. <br /> <br />WHITMORE: Correct. <br /> <br />ONO: So it would not be a 10-year program, it would be a 15-year program, roughly in ending. <br /> <br />WHITMORE: I think you’re correct in your assessment. It’s however you’re initiated, by <br />initiating a process after ten years, what you’re basically saying is we’ve got ten years of <br />experience of the current General Plan under our belt, and at that point, we’re gonna start a very <br />thorough review of that plan and how well the policies, goals and action items in that have, have <br />been implemented. So with that experience, we can do that process but, yes, it will be roughly <br />be 15 years before any proposed changes to that reach Council. <br /> <br />ONO: So your request really would be affecting a, I don’t know, a Constitutional change for a <br />15-year program? <br /> <br />WHITMORE: There’s, nowhere in the State Constitution or County Charter does, is a time line <br />established for the length of, the time between comprehensive reviews. <br /> <br />ONO: Thank you. <br /> <br />GONZALES: So, Mr. Whitmore, so basically you’re telling us we’re not gonna make it anyway, <br />right? <br /> <br />WHITMORE: That’s the bottom line. It’s been impossible to initiate the process so-- <br /> <br />GONZALES: All right. Thank you. Do you have anything else? <br /> <br />WHITMORE: The only slides I had remaining was to walk the Commission through the steps <br />that this proposed amendment needs to follow from here. <br /> <br />GONZALES: You guys want to hear that? Why not? <br /> <br />WHITMORE: Really quickly. So we, the Planning Director initiated this amendment on <br />rd <br />December 23 of last year. That kicked off a 45-day public comment period. During that <br />period, we held two workshops, one in Hilo, one in Kona. During that time, during that 45-day <br />period, nobody attended either workshop, and no public comment was received. So then on <br />th <br />February 20, I believe, the Director submitted the proposed amendment to the Planning <br />Commissions, both Windward and Leeward. You have 120 days to submit a recommendation to <br />5 <br />EXHIBIT D <br /> <br /> <br />