Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ARTHURS: That was the general meeting? Is that-- <br /> <br />th <br />MIYASATO: 2013, September 4, Orchidland Community Association, Board of Directors. <br /> <br />ARTHURS: --what— <br /> <br />MIYASATO: --reviewed-- <br /> <br />ARTHURS: --I don’t believe so, no. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Okay, in this letter that was submitted by Marti Morishige, in Condition 6, it <br />states that “we believe a traffic signal at Orchidland Drive and Highway 130 is essential” and <br />you just stated that the Directors are agreeing that Condition 6 can be deleted. <br /> <br />ARTHURS: No, that condition needs to be, needs to stay. That is a safety issue. It’s a serious <br />safety issue. It is unfair that the burden of that light be laid on one person. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Okay, thank you. <br /> <br />ARTHURS: Is that what we’re saying? <br /> <br />DEXTER: Well, I think if I understand correctly— <br /> <br />HATA-FINLEY: Mike, please. <br /> <br />DEXTER: I think if I understand that question correctly, because the condition is attached to <br />this specific owner—is that correct? Then maybe it should be rescinded but the fact remains <br />that, that is an unsafe intersection. So it depends, I look at it, cause we, we need the problem <br />fixed. But it is unfair that Mr. Gadd’s whole project is held up because of this condition, so that, <br />I think it’s a condition for his permit—it basically should be dropped for his permit because he <br />should be able to go forward with his business, but the problem needs to still be solved. <br /> <br />GONZALES: I understand, but if Condition 6 remains then, it’s on him, so Commissioner <br />Miyasato, you don’t want Condition 6 in there then. <br /> <br />ARTHURS: We realize, the Board realizes that the special permit request which you’re <br />considering today is but a stop gap until the rezoning goes forward, and at that time, these issues <br />will have a more serious take I guess you would say. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Any questions? Commissioner Henkel? <br /> <br />HENKEL: Yeah, I, you know, Mr. Gadd’s project I don’t think is going to create a dangerous <br />intersection there. It’s already a dangerous intersection, and I think it’s the State’s kuleana to <br />remedy that. Actually, I agree with them that it shouldn’t fall all onto this one person. If <br />anything, I think Jeff Darrow mentioned there’s some kind of a shared plan with some of the <br />10 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />