Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DEXTER: Robert Dexter— <br /> <br />HATA-FINLEY: Mike please. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Use your microphone too, please. <br /> <br />DEXTER: Robert Dexter. I reside in Orchidland Subdivision on Auli‘i. You need the actual <br />address? We support this. On Condition 3 we agreed that the language was, is somewhat <br />ambiguous and we, we’ve discussed entering into discussions to clarify that language better. We <br />had no objection to the extensions, for the 5-year extension, for the additional hours. With the, <br />on Condition 5 with the roads, we basically, we’re getting ready to resurface the Orchidland <br />Drive. It’s chipseal right now. You see, saw the pictures. It’s you know not the best condition, <br />but we’re getting ready to resurface it with asphalt. So, our major concern is, is that as this <br />project comes in, that, particularly the shoulders of the roads are protected so that when it’s <br />developed, Mr. Gadd will ensure that patrons and everything are put in properly, and any <br />drainage that’s necessary so we don’t have additional problems with water. So, you know, <br />basically, our investment that we put into resurfacing this road isn’t damaged. Also, one of the <br />things that we’re concerned about is you know we have very limited resources within our <br />association. We have 42 miles of road, and we’re trying to bring up the standards. We would <br />like that if you know when this comes up for rezoning potentially in the future that we’d like to <br />turn over this segment of road to the County, and that way, we’re not putting a burden on the <br />commercial properties with trying to collect higher fees for their commercial uses, and it would <br />just clear up a lot of issues we have in--. So on the mauka side of Mr. Gadd’s property, we’d like <br />to take that whole segment and eventually turn it over to the County. It would just be simpler <br />and easier for everybody because there’s too many players in this, and we also agree that it <br />would, you know as far as signalization, you’re basically putting all of this on one individual. <br />You know, so if it’s a million dollars to put in a signal light, is that fair and reasonable to ask of <br />one business to come in that he gets a million dollar bill to enter into the market? So, we confer <br />with Mr. Gadd’s position on the signalization. Any questions? <br /> <br />GONZALES: Commissioners, any questions for Mr. Dexter? <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: I might have misunderstood your position. You’re saying in your testimony <br />this morning that the association is in agreement with the modification of Condition 6? <br /> <br />DEXTER: We agree that, you know, it’s a problematic intersection. You know, it needs to be <br />addressed. We don’t feel that it should all be put on this one particular person. You know I mean <br />everybody pays taxes to the State and everything. But, we’re basically, it’s a showstopper for <br />this whole project, if you’re looking at how much money it takes to put in the signal and why <br />does one person get that. So, you know, there should be some way to either solve it by <br />everybody contributing or the State standing up because everybody is a taxpayer and paying for <br />it. What it is, is a problematic intersection. It’s not a very safe as all the traffic—it’s much like <br />all the other intersections on the whole highway. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Any other questions? Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Dexter. We have one more <br />person signed up. Mr. Bob Arthurs. Would you like to come forward please? <br />8 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />