2014-04-03HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-PD INITIATED USE 12-034 & AMEND USE 12-034

Home

COTTLE: May I clarify one thing that’s being discussed related to Page 6 of our Background Report. Condition 9 is actually related to the traffic control devices. The language that Mr. Brilhante and the Director were referring to adding is just the last paragraph at the bottom of Page 6. And that is just another condition we would want added onto the permit. So as far as the traffic control devices go, for Condition 9, the Planning Commission could amend the condition to require installation of the signs at a specific point in time, or leave the condition as it is open ended to have Department of Public Works determine when those smart signs should be installed. GONZALES: So, an approval of this leaves—who gets to decide if we approve this. When and if we’re gonna do smart signs? COTTLE: Okay, for Item 6, the non-compliance issue, it wouldn’t be an approval. The Commission needs to decide based on what we’re recommending, what action it wants to take, so there’s no approval or denial. GONZALES: We decide or— COTTLE: Yes. GONZALES: --we give them the authority to decide? COTTLE: That’s up to you to give the authority to the Director to decide, but it’s the Commission that must take action on the non-compliance issue. For Item 7, which is a separate item where the applicant requested the amendment, just to Condition 8, that would be an approval or denial of their request to amend the permit. GONZALES: But that’s the next one, right? COTTLE: Yes. GONZALES: Okay, very good. COTTLE: So we give you like a menu of options basically for Item No. 6 to choose from. GONZALES: Thank you. ONO: Question to staff, Mr. Chair. GONZALES: Yes, Mr. Ono. ONO: Clarify for me please. The smart signs? Those are the traffic— COTTLE: Control devices— 20 EXHIBIT F