My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-04-03HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-PD INITIATED USE 12-034 & AMEND USE 12-034
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2014
>
2014-04-03HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-PD INITIATED USE 12-034 & AMEND USE 12-034
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 3:34:33 PM
Creation date
5/29/2014 3:34:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />COTTLE: Yeah, that complaint has already been resolved. They were assessed a $500 fine for <br />basically cutting down most of the trees on the property during Hawaiian Hawk breeding season <br />which was one of your conditions that they not do that. So that complaint has already been <br />resolved. <br /> <br />ONO: And can the other concern that I have is, I would assume that the Kaūmana Drive <br />improvement, the need to have that completed before they did the vertical structures was so that <br />the materials and whatever would have an easier time getting into the development, so doing it <br />concurrently as you’re recommending would place a heavier traffic burden on the existing <br />Kaūmana today because of the, the improvement have not even taken place. <br /> <br />COTTLE: When you say the improvement, you mean the Kaūmana Drive improvement? <br /> <br />ONO: Yes. <br /> <br />COTTLE: The condition was included in the permit originally because an agreement was <br />worked out between the Luana Gardens Community Association and the applicant. The <br />community association had concern that a lot of truck traffic would be going in and out of the <br />driveway access. So this was an agreement those two parties had come to, yeah they had asked <br />for, the applicant had asked that site work could be done while improvements to Kaūmana Drive <br />were being constructed so you know, grading, grubbing, leveling the pad, but not actual vertical <br />construction because the assumption was that would bring in more traffic. You’d have more <br />contractor workers coming in compared to as if you were just having like grading equipment on <br />site. So, that was the reason for the condition in the beginning. Now whether or not there are <br />traffic concerns or safety concerns because more traffic may be generated, I think Department of <br />Public Works should respond to that. <br /> <br />ONO: Okay, I live on that, further up, but I live on that and I can already see problems with the <br />traffic so I guess what I’m asking is that if you do it concurrently, if the road is not complete, you <br />will have more traffic problems at this because you’re doing things concurrently. So the original <br />recommendation of having the Kaūmana Drive Road completed first makes sense to me and a, <br />but if the association is saying they’re willing to compromise, well, I guess my problem is minor <br />compared to their’s, so I just wanted to clarify. <br /> <br />COTTLE: Okay. <br /> <br />ONO: Thank you. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Okay, I think we’re okay for now. I’d like to call up the applicant if I may. Sir, <br />will you raise your right hand, please? Do you swear to tell the truth today before the Windward <br />Planning Commission? <br /> <br />STROUD: I do. <br /> <br />GONZALES. Thank you. Go ahead, sir. And, we have Mr. Brilhante. <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT F <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.