2014-05-01HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-JOHN HABERMANN SPP14-159

Home

tough situation and again, it’s the Planning Director might have more information on this, but this is something we wrestled about , and we thought that this might become an issue at the hearing, and so it’s something that maybe the Commissioners could discuss as well. GONZALES: Would it be reasonable to say that when Mr. Habermann’s application comes up for an extension then maybe at that time is when he would get hit with the fair share? DARROW: It could be. I mean, that’s something that you folks can consider. There’s a cost factor, right, what if others come in and you know, and if others put in, then you start having— well how do we, you know, differentiate how much to give to each person, and it becomes a little difficult. GONZALES: Thank you. Mr. Director, is there anything you want to say on that or does that sum or cover it up—Mr. Kanuha. KANUHA: No. GONZALES: No? Okay. ONO: Mr. Chair? I have a question for staff. GONZALES: Oh, sorry. Mr. Ono. ONO: You were mentioning that the association is looking at paving the entire— DARROW: Correct. That’s our understanding. Again, this was just third hand information that rd we received that, that Paradise Park is planning on paving 33 until the end. ONO: I’m just concerned about the original— DARROW: Correct. ONO: --tenants if I may call them that. Would they then have to contribute to the extension of paving the remainder of the road? I mean, would that be a consideration? DARROW: You mean the applicants? ONO: No. Mr. Sumida. DARROW: Well, I believe that being a part of the association, you have to participate in road maintenance fees yearly. And so that all becomes just part of your dues that you pay and then you pave all that. I don’t think they’re going to make the businesses pay more unless they have, certain subdivisions have—you know, if you’re operating a business, you pay a little bit more, in your, in your road association dues but-- 6 EXHIBIT D