Laserfiche WebLink
Another item that approached was the--about biological surveys. It was stated that Connections <br />was going to build on the lower campus—the 30 something odd acres—it was quoted there are <br />pristine ‘Ōhi‘a forests. And it’s not. The biological survey determined, which I have right here, <br />that it is full of invasive species. These invasive species were generated by the establishment of <br />the neighborhood. So, Connections wants to come in and be a, you know, to help ease this <br />invasive problem that was caused by the neighborhood and yet they’re being accused of leveling <br />a pristine ‘Ōhi‘a forest. That’s up north on the part that Connections is not going to develop. So, <br />with that, in order to expedite the process, and not cause any delays, you know concerning the <br />Ethics Commission and so forth, even though I don’t really feel that I should have to recuse <br />myself, I’m going to recuse myself from this agenda item and hope that you folks can do the <br />right thing. So, thank you. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Thank you, Commissioner Henkel. Margaret. <br /> <br />MASUNAGA: Thank you, Commissioner Henkel, and I just, for the record, I did want to state <br />the Code section we were looking at, does apply to Commissioners, and it is Section 2-84, <br />Conflicts of Interest, and it says in part under subsection “a,” no officer, of which a <br />Commissioner is deemed in the definition, shall take any official action affecting a business or <br />other undertaking in which that officer or employee has a substantial financial interest. And I <br />did consult with my colleagues at the Office of the Corporation Counsel, including Renee <br />Schoen and Molly Stebbins, and they did concur with me. I know it’s, you know, it’s a very <br />divisive application but you know that was the advice that we felt needed to happen today. And <br />I want to thank you. <br /> <br />HENKEL: Thank you for that but you know I still wonder why I feel the circumstances of my <br />employment and participation are the same as Mr. Ishibashi’s, and I’m wondering why the same <br />standards didn’t apply back then. And this is in no way a criticism of Wallace by the way. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Thank you, Commissioner Henkel, and I realize that you’re doing this in order to <br />get this moved along. <br /> <br />HENKEL: I want to see it move along. <br /> <br />Commissioner Henkel recused himself at 10:51 a.m. and observed the meeting from the <br />audience. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Thank you. Before we go any further, if anybody hasn’t signed up to testify, <br />please see the ladies over here on my right. We have 4,000 pages of documents from this since <br />we’ve started. We’ve read it all. We’ve looked at it all. Please if you’re going to testify you <br />know, make it good. I mean, we don’t need redundancy. We had enough. All right, with that, <br />Jeff, bring us up to speed. <br /> <br />DARROW: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. This is a continued hearing. We’ve had a number of <br />hearings on this matter. What I would like to do is just do a brief overview of the area the <br />application and our timeline that’s occurred up to this point. Thank you. <br /> <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT F <br /> <br /> <br />