My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-05-01 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014-2015
>
2014-05-01 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2014 11:24:00 AM
Creation date
6/12/2014 11:21:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
is a complaint about a specific person, names are not compromised. Ms. Maddox <br />thanked Ms. Garson for the offer. <br />Ms. Maddox is of the understanding that the subcommittees are already set up <br />and procedurally there cannot be any changes. Ms. Garson replied that nothing has <br />been done yet so now would be the time to make any changes. Ms. Maddox was <br />thinking if there were others who would be willing to support Mr. Mitchell or Mr. Espejo <br />since they have a couple departments they are working on their own, if not, they'll move <br />forward with the subcommittees set up. Mr. Mitchell said he's going to depend on legal <br />counsel, Ms. Maddox and Ms. Kualii to help out. <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz asked what is the timeframe to complete all the interviews. <br />Ms. Maddox said by September 4t" all the interviews should be completed and working <br />towards a November 6t" deadline for a draft report. The report is due on January 15, <br />2015. Ms. Kierkiewicz asked if there is to be a physical presentation of the report to the <br />Mayor and Council. Ms. Garson replied no. <br />Ms. Garson noted there was a comment earlier about giving the departments an <br />opportunity to review the draft report. Ms. Maddox said the police chief did request an <br />opportunity to review his recommendations. <br />Ms. Maddox said they have not touched on what format the report will take. <br />She liked the format of the last report, there was a little bit of context, an overview <br />and general recommendations and specific recommendations and it flowed nicely. <br />Ms. Maddox likes the notion of continuing to refine a process that's in place rather than <br />reinventing the wheel. Mr. Mitchell agreed. <br />Ms. Garson said if she recalls correctly, everyone had input and in the end, it was <br />to make the report readable. <br />Ms. Garson asked that when the subcommittees get done with their meetings, if <br />they could send the completed matrix to Ms. Kualii to be placed on the agenda for <br />discussion. <br />Ms. Kelly asked if okay to contact their subcommittee partner by phone — she <br />does not have a phone list. Ms. Garson asked if all Commissioners consent to having <br />their phone numbers given out each commissioner. All agreed. Consent will be needed <br />from Mr. Masuda as he was not present at the meeting. Ms. Maddox asked if six <br />commissioners were in the room, could they Facetime Mr. Masuda to get his consent. <br />Ms. Garson replied no. <br />6. ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON NEXT AGENDA <br />7. DISCUSSION REGARDING LOCATIONS /DATES /TIMES OF FUTURE <br />MEETINGSIVIDEO CONFERENCING <br />Ms. Maddox asked the Commissioners if they could use the month of May to do <br />as many interviews as they could and then meet again on the first Thursday in June <br />E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.