Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Minutes of May 6, 2014 Meeting of the Kailua Village Design Commission <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2.Design review of a sign permit variance application for one ground sign and two wall signs <br />exceeding allowable maximum area and lettering/symbol heights for “Holiday Inn Express <br />& Suites” hotel. Applicant: Ina Custom Signs. Landowner: Kona Hospitality LLC. <br />TMK: 7-5-007:009. Located at 75-146 Sarona Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Childs first described the proposed ground sign, noting that in addition to the 18 sq. ft. sign area <br />described in the variance application, which he measured to actually be approximately 19 sq. ft., the <br />sign pedestal itself was internally illuminated in the same color as the sign. He said that it therefore <br />seemed to be part of the entire sign to be considered. He noted that the illuminated area contained <br />within the sign’s pedestal and cap altogether comprises an additional 10 square feet, bringing the total <br />ground sign area up to 29 square feet if calculated as he suggested it should be. Noting the proposed <br />sign is to be constructed entirely of metal and illuminated, curved plastic, Mr. Childs stated that only <br />the proposed lettering, having a maximum height of 9 inches, complied with the Master Plan for <br />Kailua-Kona, and the rest of the sign was entirely modernistic in appearance. <br /> <br />Projecting digital site photos showing the nearly completed building, Mr. Childs identified the <br />proposed locations of the two proposed wall signs, internally illuminated and comprising 32 and 43 <br />square feet respectively, and each to be mounted high on the building at the middle of the third floor <br />elevation of the mauka wall (facing Kuakini Hwy. over an intervening parcel) and north wall (facing <br />Sarona Rd.). He noted that both signs would substantially exceed the 12 sq. ft. maximum allowable <br />in the Kailua Village Core Area, and that the sign facing Sarona Road proposed lettering up to 17” <br />high which exceeds the 9 inch height allowable in this area. <br /> <br />Mr. Childs identified, through use of projected photos, the apparent difficulties that the hotel <br />operator may be facing in placing its signage where it can be visible to arriving or returning motorist <br />customers. He said that these difficulties seem partially caused by the building being accessible only <br />by a right-in, right-out, back-angled minor road which is offset just beyond a signalized intersection <br />(Kalani Street/Kuakini Hwy.), and where the approach visibility of the subject building is largely <br />obscured by a three-story streetfront building (Kuakini Tower) at that signalized intersection. <br /> <br />However, Mr. Childs stated that the size of the three proposed signs, coupled with the proposed <br />illumination of large plastic facings, presented a modernistic appearance currently unmatched in scale <br />within the Kailua Village Core Area, and do not appear to comply with the guidelines of the Master <br />Plan for Kailua-Kona. Finally, Mr. Childs reminded the commissioners of their signage suggestions <br />offered to the applicant several years previously, when the hotel building was presented to the <br />Commission for its design review and recommendations; the commissioners had recommended that <br />the applicant use natural lava rock framing materials for a ground sign, and predominately earth-tone <br />colors for all signs. <br /> <br />In the following discussion, commissioners reviewed the provided digital photos of the building from <br />its Kuakini Hwy. and Sarona Road points of view, and expressed a variety of concerns about the <br />proposed sign placements and illuminated sizes. Commissioners noted the proposed mauka <br />(Kuakini) facing sign would seem to provide limited visibility to motorists, despite its proposed large, <br />illuminated size (32 sq. ft.), and therefore doubted that its visual impact would be beneficial to <br />anyone, particularly with its design being so out of character with the Kailua Village Master Plan. <br />Commissioner Andreae suggested the applicant consider placement of a single sign on the façade of <br />the abbreviated porte cochere instead of the large Sarona Rd. facing walling sign and the ground sign. <br /> <br /> <br />