My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-04-17 Minutes Salary Commission
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-04-17 Minutes Salary Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2014 1:12:03 PM
Creation date
6/26/2014 1:12:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission April 17, 2014 <br /> Mr. Hermes clarified that he believes that the deputies pay is a function of 95%of <br /> either the Corporation Counsel or the Prosecuting Attorney salaries—whichever is <br /> the highest. <br /> Mr. De Lima commented that there was an increase in the Prosecutor's salary in <br /> October 2013 and that everyone was eligible for a pay increase. Mr. Hermes <br /> agreed, but in Mr. Kamelamela's case, his current salary is, basically, 95%of the <br /> Prosecuting Attorney's salary. Mr. De Lima stated that it's not really accurate to say <br /> that nobody's received a pay increase for an x-number of years because they <br /> increased the Prosecuting Attorney's salary and everyone was eligible for an <br /> increase. <br /> Mr. Hermes replied that prior to the November 2013 increase of the Corporation <br /> Counsel many of his deputies were at that maximum threshold of the$113,000. <br /> Mr. De Lima stated that was because they had increased the Prosecuting Attorney's <br /> salary a year prior to the October meeting—either in 2012 or early 2013. <br /> Ms. Stebbins clarified that former Prosecutor Jay Kimura was at$113,000 level <br /> under the old step system. When Charlene Iboshi stepped into his position,the <br /> Salary Commission took action and stated that Ms. Iboshi should maintain that <br /> salary level of$113,000. And so, for quite some time, the deputies have all been <br /> paid at about 90%. Mr. De Lima commented that, in other words,they never <br /> increased the Prosecuting Attorney's salary and had capped Ms. Iboshi at$113,000. <br /> Mr. Hermes replied that when the Commission increased the Corporation Counsel's <br /> salary, there really wasn't any effect on the deputy's salaries. <br /> Mr. De Lima stated that, based on Mr. Kamelamela's testimony, if anyone is going <br /> to see a pay increase, we would need to increase the Prosecuting Attorney's salary. <br /> There'd be room for an increase for anyone making below$102,000. Mr. Hermes <br /> agreed. <br /> Ms. Stroh was surprised that this wasn't brought to the attention of the <br /> Commission. <br /> Ms. Stebbins said that the Salary Commission doesn't have any authority over the <br /> deputy's salaries. Indirectly, it was affected because the deputy's salaries are paid <br /> based on the salary of the Corporation Counsel or Prosecuting Attorney. The <br /> deputy's salaries is set per the Hawai'i County Code at 50%to 90%of either the <br /> Corporation Counsel or the Prosecuting Attorney salaries, whichever is higher. <br /> Ms. Stroh commented that this should have been noted and it would have possibly <br /> made a difference in their methodology. <br /> Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.