My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-35.1 CERS Letter to DLNR June 27 2014
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Pre-2018 Files
>
Communications to AC
>
2014
>
2014-35.1 CERS Letter to DLNR June 27 2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2014 12:00:47 PM
Creation date
6/27/2014 12:00:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Communication No. 2014-35.1 <br /> June 24, 2014 <br /> TO: William Aila Jr., Chairperson, Department of Land and Natural Resources <br /> FROM: Marlene Hapai, Chairperson, Puna Community Development Plan (PCDP) <br /> Connectivity and Emergency Response Subcommittee <br /> VIA: Patti Pinto, Chairperson, PCDP Action Committee <br /> RE: Communication No. 2014-26 Emergency Response Subcommittee of the Puna <br /> Community Development Plan Report on Prioritized Connectivity Locations, <br /> May 2014 <br /> Dear Mr. Aila, <br /> Our Puna Community Development Plan Subcommittee on Connectivity and Emergency <br /> Response met Tuesday, June 24, 2014 and read and discussed your letter. <br /> We would like to thank you for your comments on the proposed Connectivity Location 936. <br /> Your input is an essential part of the process of evaluating the efficacy of this connection point. <br /> Please be aware that the Subcommittee's report is a compilation of the suggestions received from <br /> communities and individuals all over Puna and reflects the desire of the people to have more than <br /> one way to safely access and evacuate their communities. <br /> We were aware at the time we solicited input from the Volcano Village and surrounding <br /> subdivisions that the suggested connection between Wright Road and Stainback Highway would <br /> have to cross protected lands and for that reason might not be a possible route. Our mandate was <br /> to report all of the connections suggested. <br /> Points of connectivity that have been suggested by the community will be further evaluated for <br /> feasibility and community support/opposition. You have clarified substantial reasons to avoid <br /> this route and your comments will become a permanent part of the Subcommittee's report. <br /> We will seriously consider moving this suggestion down on our priority list, will continue to <br /> accept community input and ask for any other suggestions to accomplish emergency evacuation <br /> within the Volcano area. <br /> Once again, thank you for your valuable input into this important community-driven process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.