My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-06-05HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-PARADISEPARKBAPTISTCHURCHSPP14-163
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2014
>
2014-06-05HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-PARADISEPARKBAPTISTCHURCHSPP14-163
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 10:44:25 AM
Creation date
7/8/2014 10:44:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MOORE: I defer to the Commission in terms of the timing. I’m, we’ve obviously requested <br />two. They’ve agreed to one and I, the Commission has to make that, maybe split the difference, <br />but the paving is a big issue actually, more so than one or two years, and we really would like <br />that to be addressed and amended. <br /> <br />th <br />OKA: I think the cost of doing a paved driveway from 24 to the church property would be a lot <br />more than just doing a stone driveway. That cost would be quite burdensome on the church. <br /> <br />MOORE: Thank you. <br /> <br />ONO: Excuse me, Mr. Chair. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Commissioner Ono. <br /> <br />ONO: Am I understanding you to say that if we don’t recommend this paved driveway and the <br />th <br />paved parking lot, that the funding would then be diverted to the clearings between 24 to the <br />area so that you can accommodate the switch from—well, I guess what I’m asking is that you’re <br />not, you’re going to spend the same dollar amount, but you’re going to be looking at providing a <br />th <br />driveway from the 24 Avenue, is that what we’re, you’re suggesting at this time? <br /> <br />OKA: Yeah, it would be--there is, there would be a big price difference between having a paved, <br />as they’re saying, a paved driveway coming to the, to the church parking lot, rather than a stone <br />driveway. To have it paved would, you know, be very costly. <br /> <br />th <br />ONO: Yeah, my only, so that--you will still need to spend the money to provide that 24, the <br />driveway. <br /> <br />OKA: Right. <br /> <br />ONO: But that, the other thing that I am concerned about though is that I still think, well my <br />thoughts are that, we’re not going to excuse you from providing a paved driveway and paved -- <br /> <br />OKA: Yeah, no we’re not, yeah. <br /> <br />ONO: -- parking lot for the future, though. It needs to be addressed in the Recommendation if <br />we’re going this route, that there should be a time table for you to provide yourself a paved <br />parking lot for the church, for the area of the church. It’s not going to be left unpaved <br />permanently. <br /> <br />OKA: Okay, no, we plan to you know put in parking but like I said before we don’t want to <br />develop this property as much as we plan to do the future sanctuary. You know, we don’t want <br />to put all the money into this property and then you know not use it as much as we plan to. <br /> <br />10 <br />EXHIBIT E <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.