My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-06-05HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-CELLCODBAVERIZONUSE14-046
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2014
>
2014-06-05HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-CELLCODBAVERIZONUSE14-046
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 10:47:44 AM
Creation date
7/8/2014 10:47:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
So, it used to be that the Zoning Code was more restrictive. The Code now since it’s been <br />amended is more restrictive than our Zoning Code. <br /> <br />NISHIMOTO: In your opinion, would it be more likely for trees and other utility poles to fall in <br />the event of a natural disaster? <br /> <br />MARTIN: You know, I don’t, I can’t say that for sure, but what I can say is that this tower will <br />be designed for 105 miles an hour—probably more because we provide for co-location and so <br />they beef it up a little bit more, and I can tell you that at a 105 miles an hour, it’s not going to just <br />be the tower. It is going to be, most probably I think would be the antennas or the branches that <br />actually might come off first. I don’t, I don’t see that the tower is really going to ever fall over, <br />but at that point, when you have a hurricane that’s gonna be that big, and you know, that big of <br />winds, sustained winds like that, you’re gonna have not just that flying around, but you’re <br />probably going to have the neighbor’s house, and a lot of other things flying around, and so I just <br />think that it’s, you know, would be a double standard to say that a cell phone tower that meets a <br />105 mile an hour can’t have any damage to it after they complied with Code and then, and then <br />have the house next door’s roof fly over, you know? Just my personal opinion. <br /> <br />NISHIMOTO: In your 20 years of experience, have you ever been aware of a Verizon monopine <br />tower falling in the State of Hawai‘i? <br /> <br />MARTIN: No. <br /> <br />NISHIMOTO: Okay, I’d like to direct everyone Exhibits E and F, Verizon’s Exhibits E and F. <br />One of Mr. Inaba’s concerns is that his property is located in, within the tower’s, the proposed <br />tower’s fall radius. Can you explain a little bit more about what Exhibit E represents? <br /> <br />MARTIN: Yes, I prepared this Exhibit actually using the County’s Real Property Tax GIS <br />system. So, you’ll see the outline of Mr. Inaba’s tower, property, sorry. You’ll see that he’s got <br />his, where his, the outline of his property is, and then also I took coordinates. We had a surveyor. <br />We have to provide survey coordinates to the FCC for regulation purposes, so I had that <br />information, and I searched that and used that pinpoint and measured on the Google from the <br />center of the tower, to a 105 feet or approximately a 100 to 105 feet. It’s not really that exact. <br />I’m not all that good at Google but anyways, it’s approximate, too, and it didn’t, didn’t seem like <br />it even crossed the road. So, it’s—it’s well away from Mr. Inaba’s property. <br /> <br />NISHIMOTO: Okay, and then what about Exhibit F? Can you explain what that is? <br /> <br />MARTIN: Yes, we actually tried to, we actually looked around at the existing residences there <br />and tried to figure the closest area there and to see if it was in a fall radius of an existing house. <br /> <br />NISHIMOTO: And is it within the fall radius of any structure or residence? <br /> <br />MARTIN: No. <br />15 <br />EXHIBIT F <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.