My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-06-05HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-CELLCODBAVERIZONUSE14-046
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2014
>
2014-06-05HEARINGTRANSCRIPT-CELLCODBAVERIZONUSE14-046
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 10:47:44 AM
Creation date
7/8/2014 10:47:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
where you’re siting the tower, it should be a continuation of the north boundary line of the parcel <br />you’re identifying as mine. And, if that’s the case, and you’re setting the tower back 20 feet <br />from the side, the side setback, it should be further lower on this picture. Do you have any <br />questions, Mr. Martin? <br /> <br />MARTIN: I don’t—I can’t comment on that. I put in the coordinates into Google Earth, and I <br />used the County’s website. If it’s off a little bit, it might be. <br /> <br />INABA: Okay, then if this picture’s off, if you went to Exhibit F— <br /> <br />MARTIN: Yeah, it’s still across from your property, right? <br /> <br />INABA: No, I’m trying to get to Exhibit F. So, if that tower is a little high on the picture, if you <br />went to Exhibit F, and it’s a little lower than it should be, that tower may fall on that structure, <br />and that’s all I said. The tower may, or it appears it may fall on the structure. <br /> <br />MARTIN: Even if it was off, I actually interestingly enough, I met the guy that did the website <br />for the Real Property Tax last night. And, I talked to him about this issue, and I said it looks like <br />when you go to these sites, that it’s off a little bit. And he did say that it was off by like three <br />degrees or something, and they were working to fix that, but he said it’s obvious how, how, what <br />the adjustment is because you can see that the lot doesn’t line up with the street like it should. <br />So, even, even if it was to be adjusted that way, and even if this was to say the tower was to stay <br />where it is, and Mr. Inaba’s property would border this street, it still wouldn’t cross over. <br /> <br />INABA: No, I never said it would cross into my property. I’m talking about Exhibit F where <br />you’re showing that it doesn’t reach a structure on that Parcel 49— <br /> <br />MARTIN: You still say the — <br /> <br />INABA: I’m saying if the tower were supposed to be further down or lower on this picture, it <br />would be closer to the structure. That’s all I’m saying. It appears it may hit the structure. <br /> <br />MARTIN: So, these are surveyed coordinates. These coordinates are correct. The tower is <br />where I’m showing it on here unless Google Earth is wrong and that’s rare— <br /> <br />INABA: --You know, I would agree with you that the person that told you that it may be off, I <br />would agree, and I would just say that both of these pictures are unreliable— <br /> <br />MARTIN: No, no, not these coordinates. I’m talking about the map itself. And you can tell by <br />looking at—yeah, the tmk line’s off, not the map itself. <br /> <br />INABA: Well, you can’t, nobody can be sure of that. I’m just saying these two maps are <br />unreliable, and we shouldn’t rely on them. You actually said that the person you talked to said <br />21 <br />EXHIBIT F <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.