My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-05-15 Leeward Exh A (SPP 14-161)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2014
>
2014-05-15 Leeward Exh A (SPP 14-161)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2014 9:29:15 AM
Creation date
7/18/2014 9:29:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OKAGI: The original builder on the property for some reason connected the second meter only <br />directly to some irrigation, which was on the lower part of the property. We actually experienced a <br />major leak there, so we just shut off the irrigation down there because we are not growing anything; <br />we decided not to grow anything really water-intensive there partially because of the leak and the <br />cost associated with repairing that, because some of the plumbing was running underneath the <br />driveway and it would have been too much of a disruption to address that at the time. So we just <br />shut everything off. So from the meter there is already a backflow preventer, and we can, it seems <br />like, fairly easily just connect up the main house plumbing to the meter and address the issue. <br /> <br />The issue with the current leak, which we suspect, we brought a plumber out to address a couple of <br />visible leaks that were popping up, and we weren’t able to find the larger leak. So with everything <br />shut down on the property and no water running, when I went down to the meter, it was going at <br />about five gallons per minute, which I just calculated out to 7,200 gallons per day. And it’s <br />definitely something that we should have been on top of, but we’ve just been busy and haven’t <br />really looked at the water bill, which is on auto-pay, and so we are just literally pouring money <br />down the ground. So we want to, of course, address that as soon as possible. So we expect that <br />after addressing the leak, the water consumption will be in the neighborhood of about 2 to 3,000 <br />gallons per day, which is still over the allowed consumption. And I’m not sure how we are going to <br />address that because that’s just the amount of water that gets used. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: So, Mr. Okagi, you are saying that for both meters the consumption will be, what was <br />that? Did you say 2,000? <br /> <br />OKAGI: In the neighborhood of 2,000 to 3,000 -. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Each. <br /> <br />OKAGI: Gallons per day total. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: No, no. no. <br /> <br />OKAGI: Total. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Oh, oh, oh, so both meters, that would be the total usage. <br /> <br />OKAGI: Together, right. Which, the allowed consumption would be 800 gallons per day, so we <br />are still over that. And I don’t, other than shutting off our irrigation all together, I don’t know how <br />we can get off of that number. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Have you consulted with the Department of Water Supply and gotten some <br />recommendations from them? <br /> <br />OKAGI: Not for the, currently not yet, but we will. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Mr. Chairman, I’m uncomfortable with this overage. According to the Background <br />Report on Page 4, Item No. 28, at that time their usage was 10,420 gallons per day, and the usage is <br />800. So I’m in a quandary as to what to do regarding this, because I think that it’s not just affecting <br />them, it’s affecting the whole area. And I understand that water is an issue there. And I don’t see <br />6 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.