My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-05-15 Leeward Exh C (Amend Zoning Code Bill Nos. 191 & 192)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2014
>
2014-05-15 Leeward Exh C (Amend Zoning Code Bill Nos. 191 & 192)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2014 9:30:57 AM
Creation date
7/18/2014 9:30:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BEAUDET: Okay, if there are no further comments or questions from the Commissioners, there is <br />no -. <br /> <br />KAHOLO: Mr. Chair? <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Yes. <br /> <br />KAHOLO: Yeah, I’ve got a question. Are we combining two bills together -. <br /> <br />COTTLE: No. <br /> <br />KAHOLO: On our decision here? <br /> <br />COTTLE: We are keeping them separate. <br /> <br />KAHOLO: Yeah, okay. Because if I look at 191 and 192, there is a separation with CV, MCX, you <br />know, two different codes in there, what is required under different section. <br /> <br />COTTLE: Right. A lot of the uses that are, a lot of the industrial uses that are listed under <br />permitted uses in the MCX district, are also included in the ML district, because they tend to be <br />light industrial uses, a little bit more commercial in nature. So most of those uses are included in <br />the Light Industrial district, which tends to be heavier industrial uses; so the assumption is if it’s <br />good for the MCX district, has little impact here, of course it would be good for the Limited <br />Industrial district, which has heavier industrial uses. So this is why the Director is saying maybe it <br />would be good to mix some, you know, residential uses, school uses, more commercial uses into the <br />MCX district, but not necessarily the Limited Industrial district. And that’s why we are looking at <br />these separately. <br /> <br />KAHOLO: Yeah, looking at what I’m reading here, you know, I can see the difference; first is, you <br />know, school or elementary type or day care center versus what we’ve got out there, you know. It <br />would make more sense what the Director is looking at. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Thank you for everyone’s comments. We have had no one from the community to <br />sign up for testimony, so I’d like to ask our attendees, attendee, one last time. With that, if there is <br />no further comment or discussion by the Commissioners, I would like to ask for a motion. And as <br />previously determined, a motion on both of the agenda items, but the motion shall be stated <br />separately for record keeping. Commissioners? <br /> <br />WHITTEMORE: Mr. Chair? <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Yes. <br /> <br />WHITTEMORE: I’d like to make a motion that we send, the Planning Commission send an <br />unfavorable recommendation to the County Council on Bill No. 191 – you want us to consolidate <br />them? <br /> <br />BEAUDET: You can say along with, yeah? <br /> <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.