Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the effect of law. Rule 3, Declaratory Rulings, 3.2 Form and Content of Petitions, Section 3 a <br />designation of the specific statute, ordinance, rule or order of the question is required. The <br />petition filed lists no violation of the Code of Ethics, therefore, it is in violation your own rules <br />and procedures. It is against a candidate who is not an employee or official of the County of <br />Hawai‘i, and therefore, you do not have jurisdiction over it. This Board minus Mr. Adams there, <br />is in knowing and knowingly violation of this, for they state in Petition 2011-05, Mr. Balsis, on <br />Petition 2011-05, the complaint here specifically targeted an attorney. I understand that the <br />status of the ethics committee or the status and also court law does not have jurisdiction over a <br />former employee. Former employee, non-employee, okay. Ms. Schoen goes on to enforce this <br />fact and give state law. There are three pages here. If you go into all of the times I have sat <br />before this Board, in testimony, representation, you will find that I read into the record quite a <br />bit. This is for the very purpose that you will have no excuse to not know or should have know <br />the violations you are incorporated in. The violations that you are being accused of as filed with <br />the Hawai‘i County Clerk, the Chief of Police and the Federal Bureau of Investigations yesterday <br />at 2:37 identify that you have been charged or have been informed of a political violation to <br />intimidate and extort a political official, in violation of Hawai‘i Revised Statutes 707-764 <br />Extortion. A person commits extortion if the person does any of the following, (i)… <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: Mr. Cole… <br /> <br />Mr. Cole: …I request an extension to finish this out for five minutes as this important to the <br />very nature of this cause. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: We need to finish things up so I’ll give you one minute, you need to sum it up <br />right now. <br /> <br />Mr. Cole: Fine. The extortion, is take or withhold action as a public servant, or cause a <br />public servant to take or withhold such action. You are public servants, you are taking, <br />withholding action. Here’s the killer, section l, do any other act that would not in itself <br />substantially benefit the defendant that is calculated to harm substantially some person with <br />respect to the threatened person’s health, calling, career or reputation. The petition filed states or <br />impugns that a person, candidate, female, did in fact commit a violation of a threshold of law that <br />a petition would be filed for in order to impugn her nature, in order to extort her and have control <br />over an electoral process. Thank you very much. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: Thank you Mr. Cole. Having no other notifications of statements from the <br />public… <br /> <br />Ms. Naeole: Yes, kalamai. My name is Emily Naeole and I’m here because of what Dan Cole <br />is talking about. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: Yes, and when it’s time for the petition we will be discussing that with you. <br /> <br />Ms. Naeole: Alright, thank you. <br /> <br />3. APPROVAL OF THE REGULAR SESSION MINUTES OF MAY 14, 2014 <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />