My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-07-16 Board of Ethics Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2014
>
2014-07-16 Board of Ethics Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2014 3:21:42 PM
Creation date
8/22/2014 3:21:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Mr. Adams: Given that there is a small typographical error, given the number that we not have <br /> to revote this that we accept it with the understanding that we will correct that <br /> small typographical error in the final document. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: I think that’s understood by everyone here. Any further discussion? All those in <br /> favor. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis, Ms. Kahakalau, Mr. Henricks, Mr. Adams (simultaneously): Aye. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: All those opposed. Hearing no opposed, the motion is passed. <br /> <br />d. Petition No. 2014-05: Review draft order dismissing petition by Mark McNett <br />alleging that County officers Debra Hecht and Gail Byrne-Baber are in violation <br />of Section 2-91.3(6) of the Code of Ethics, by inter alia, “creating, expanding, <br />and propagating PONC” and “made several personal suggestion each for PONC <br />purchases…”. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: Has everybody here had the opportunity to review the Order Dismissing Petition? <br /> Is there a motion to approve this order? <br /> <br />Mr. Adams: So move. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: It’s been moved and seconded. It’s been moved, is there a second to this motion? <br /> <br />Ms. Kahakalau: I second. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: It’s been moved and seconded to approve the Order Dismissing Petition No. <br /> 2014-05. Is there any further discussion? Hearing no further discussion I call for <br /> a vote. All those in favor. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis, Ms. Kahakalau, Mr. Henricks, Mr. Adams (simultaneously): Aye. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: All those opposed. It has been approved that Petition No. 2014-05 is dismissed. <br /> <br />Mr. McNett: Excuse me but do I get to say anything? <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: At this point in time, no, the discussion regarding the Petition was at the previous <br /> meeting. This was simply a review of the Order Dismissing the Petition for the <br /> reasons discussed last meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. McNett: So I would’ve had to be here for the public testimony. I don’t get to say anything <br /> about my petition and present the evidence that I brought that I wasn’t able to <br /> present the last time. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: I’ll give you 3 minutes, consider it public testimony. <br /> <br />Mr. McNett: Yeah, you said take a few minutes last time and I contacted Corporation Counsel <br /> in advance. Mark McNett, the name. And I asked about the duration of <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.