My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-07-03 Hearing Transcript - Scott Watson Amend SMA 450
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2014
>
2014-07-03 Hearing Transcript - Scott Watson Amend SMA 450
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2014 10:04:40 AM
Creation date
9/8/2014 10:04:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOSES: I make a motion. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Do I have a second? <br /> <br />ONO: Second. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: All in favor? <br /> <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Any opposed? Motion passes. <br /> <br />OLYMPIA: Good morning-- <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Could you raise your right hand, please? Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth <br />on this matter now before the Hawai‘i County Planning Commission? <br /> <br />OLYMPIA: Yes. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: State your name and residence. <br /> <br />OLYMPIA: Gary Olympia. I live in San Jose, California. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Go ahead. <br /> <br />OLYMPIA: Thank you for allowing me to be taken out of order. I have five adult children and <br />15 grandkids wondering why I came to Hawai‘i without bringing them from their vacation. <br /> <br />I will—okay? [Speakers were giving feedback.] Okay, one letter that I read that was submitted <br />by Ed Johnston suggests, and we agree, that the Commission between now and when this matter <br />is going to be continue to the I believe the August meeting take a view of the site so that you can <br />see and understand exactly what is being requested on the ground. We would welcome that and <br />Scott would be there with Daryn and whoever else wanted to be there with you to explain each of <br />these four matters that I will address, and I will try to be focused and clear here, and slow enough <br />where, hopefully, you can follow because there’s a big packet of information, and I don’t expect <br />that you’ve read every page. And there’s a couple things that are being added to that for your <br />assistance. <br /> <br />The four issues, the first of which is, is actually pretty simple, and we don’t believe there’s any <br />controversy with regard to that, and that is, after the Building Permit was issued, we discovered <br />that the original survey for the subdivision that created Lot 23 and the other 11 lots was, was in <br />error. And we obtained an independent resurveying so that the southern, excuse me, so that the <br />northern and westerly boundaries could be adjusted to be correct. A proper application was filed <br />with the Planning Department, has been reviewed. All of the necessary data along with that has <br />been filed with the Department, and the request was approved and extended to by the next door <br />Lot 24 owner. And all those documents have been filed and in a document that I’ll refer to in a <br />2 <br />EXHIBIT E <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.