Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – May 19, 2014 <br /> <br />REPORTS/SPECIAL COMMITTEE/PRESENTATOIN: <br /> <br />1. Larry Brown will brief the GMAC on public access, who they work with to <br />identify, enforce and maintain access and easements to public lands and <br />any suggestions that he may have to help GMAC better understand the <br />process. <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Sylvester welcomed Larry Brown who is a Planner with the County of <br />Hawaii’s Planning Dept. Mr. Brown will cover the public access process which is <br />under Chapter 205 A of the Hawaii Revised Statutes. <br /> <br />L. Brown primarily concentrates on shoreline areas. When a special <br />management area use permit, minor permit or any determination of exemption to <br />the SMA assessment application he typically looks at the potential for public <br />access to or along the shoreline over the property that is being proposed for <br />some sort of development activity and where appropriate they will utilize the <br />authority granted HRS 205 A to require public access. The process would be <br />either through a public access agreement or grant of easement document. <br /> <br />Non access have been relatively few and far between because they’re basically – <br />the only power the county has under the county’s Chapter 34 – Chapter 34 is an <br />ordinance that’s out of the Hawaii County Code that receives its authority under <br />Chapter 46 or Hawaii Revised Statutes that said that the county shall enact an <br />ordinance creating accesses where there’s subdivision activity and Chapter 34 <br />it’s where you have a lot – in a subdivision that’s creating six lots or more or <br />where you have six or more multi-family residential units going on to a property. <br /> <br />Planning Dept. sees so little subdivision activity on properties that lead to <br />mountain accesses in Hawaii County that this has only come up maybe three or <br />four times in the last ten years. Planning Dept. has secured one and they are <br />working on another one right now. And these weren’t in connection to <br />subdivisions – there have been none to L. Brown’s knowledge, ever, with regards <br />to the other trigger which is a six-unit or more multi-family development. <br /> <br />These are much more frequent in the shoreline areas that you probably could <br />well understand so Chapter 34 has come up several times and for development <br />activities in shoreline areas but more often than not are shoreline accesses are <br />the result of the imposing of any requirement for public access under the Special <br />Management permitting process and the authority granted under HRS 205 A. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that all of this really, and admittedly, he is not the attorney here <br />– that his understanding of this stems from HRS 115, which was the, as has <br />been explained to him the infamous un-mandated mandate from the state <br />legislature that the counties shall acquire public accesses to and along the <br /> 2 <br /> <br />