My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-05-19 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-05-19 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2014 8:42:34 AM
Creation date
9/23/2014 8:42:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – May 19, 2014 <br /> <br />Q.: Unless there’s a subdivision application you guys (the county) don’t plan? <br /> <br />A.: We (county) have no authority. We have no power to require it. There should <br />be a comprehensive program plan which is not in the General Plan. <br />Mr. Brown said that he feels a comprehensive program would be something that <br />would be adopted such as a resolution. However, if adopted by ordinance it <br />would have more implementation authority. This is something that would need to <br />be discussed between, the county’s attorneys and the planning director to figure <br />out what is really the best vehicle to create, and implement that kind of a <br />strategy. Also, it needs something that provides guidance that says, “Planners in <br />that are doing subdivisions shall do this…” and there’s the criteria. The county <br />has a little bit of it in Chapter 34. <br /> <br />Q.: If someone wanted to do something that was more than just the subdivision, <br />how is that addressed? <br /> <br />A.: I think we should still do that within the context of that plan or program. I think <br />it needs to be a program because when you’re talking about public access it’s <br />more than just getting a right-of-way. If you don’t talk about who’s going to be <br />responsible for improving it, maintaining it, signage, liability, parking, especially, <br />if you’re going mauka and you want to access – and there’s no place to park – <br />what are you going to do have the guys line up on the easement and the guy that <br />got here first can’t get out cause the guys blocking. <br /> <br />Q.: Does PONC have any guidelines and if so, can it be used? <br /> <br />A.: PONC has their guidelines. No, the guidelines cannot be used because it’s <br />not comprehensive. They’re just for acquisition. And all they do – they have the <br />authority to identify, prioritize, and then the funds are there for the County to <br />make the acquisition. PONC doesn’t do anything except identify, evaluate, and <br />prioritize. After that it’s up to the Mayor and the Council to decide what properties <br />to go after and negotiate with the landowners and if they have an agreeable <br />seller then they usually will come to an agreement. If they don’t have an <br />agreeable seller, it usually just ends up being a nice try. <br /> <br />Q.: What would it take for the County to following up on this issue (public <br />access)? (Question addressed to C. Schulueter, Corp Counsel and B. <br />Command, Deputy Director of Planning). <br /> <br />A.: C. Schulueter said a communal effort between the planning department and <br />the Council and the Mayor’s office – that’s sounds essential for this to get going <br />because I don’t think one body alone be able to have this happen, but I would <br />agree that there needs to be some kind of fundamental change in the way of <br />doing business. B. Command: A clear message must reach the legislative body <br />or the administrative side. Mr. Brown’s has a good point regarding some sort of <br /> 6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.