Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Hawai’i Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – April 21, 2014 <br /> <br />L. Ashida: Yeah, I guess so. <br /> <br />M.Bartell: I guess so…Isn’t that what Corporation Counsel, I mean don’t you <br />have lawyers? <br /> <br />L. Ashida: We can find someone. <br /> <br />D. Yoshina: I think prior to the Con Con meeting with reference to game <br />management \[unclear\] <br /> <br />L. Ashida: That’s correct. <br /> <br />Man: Yeah, game management is a natural resource... <br /> <br />D. Yoshina: Yeah. And then after the Con Con that particular section was taken <br />out and there’s some question as to whether or not that part was ratified. <br /> <br />L. Ashida: I totally agree with what you’re saying. <br /> <br />D. Yoshina: OK. So now… <br /> <br />L. Ashida: Right, but it was never properly litigated because \[unclear\] for <br />consideration… <br /> <br />D. Yoshina: My next question would have been is that - has that ever been <br />litigated? <br /> <br />L. Ashida: No. No. <br /> <br />D. Yoshina: In fact what we have now, if we read the constitution – it doesn’t <br />have that – but there’s a footnote – so how much… <br /> <br />L. Ashida: Zero…You don’t put any credence on a footnote. There’s a reason it’s <br />a footnote. <br /> <br />D. Yoshina: OK. So essentially what’s guiding the constitution today is that <br />statement and that footnote is just something that… <br /> <br />L. Ashida: They call it dictum. <br /> <br />D. Yoshina: Yeah. <br /> <br />L. Ashida: So actually your agenda, the statements erroneous, that’s an <br />erroneous legal conclusion. That’s why I couldn’t find it. <br /> <br /> 6 <br /> <br />