My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-03-24 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-03-24 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2014 8:45:22 AM
Creation date
9/23/2014 8:45:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – March 24, 2014 <br /> <br /> <br />W. Camara: Yeah. I mean they do, but yet… <br /> <br />Chair Sylvester: We couldn’t get that… <br /> <br />W. Camara: We cannot get too far with it. <br /> <br />Chair Sylvester: In front of (Senator) Malama Solomon last Monday…I mean… <br />I was sitting across the table from DLNR and they would not commit to a game <br />management plan. <br /> <br />D. Yoshina: If you look at the HRS and the constitution they talk \[unclear\] <br />management shall be done dah, dah, dah. \[Unclear\] <br /> <br />M. Bartell: Chair, please push the mic in front of Ike. <br /> <br />D. Yoshina: You should watch carefully the joint House and Senate resolution <br />related to the importation of non-invasive species. Cause any time you have a <br />joint resolution that means both sides are interested. <br /> <br />T. Lodge: You know one of the reasons why like HCR 98, for example, what’s <br />bad about the HCR – when I talked to I think it was Onishi’s office – he said, oh, <br />no, this is the positive for the hunters because what they want to do is give you <br />an opportunity to provide game management. And but nowhere in that bill do <br />they talk about management. No where in that bill do they talk about any of the <br />items. They don’t talk about actions. All they talk about is control of the pigs in <br />the forest period \[unclear\] organizations. But joint resolutions, like you said, is <br />bad news because it gives DLNR the opportunity to say well you know we’re all <br />bringing under the full phase, the forest – the House and Senate they want us to <br />get rid of these animals and that’s, and they’re going to, it doesn’t matter what <br />else we come up with, they’re gonna say, hey! Because they want these animals <br />out of here and you know both the House and the Senate have told us to so… <br />\[Unclear\] <br /> <br />M. Bartell: Just a comment, right, I mean we, we… I think one of the issues that <br />this group wrestles with for a long time - game management plan, right. <br /> <br />Chair Sylvester: True. <br /> <br />M. Bartell: And the lack of one. And to a large extent, all this legislation and you <br />know you worked on it, I worked on it, a lot of people worked on it and thanks for <br />working on it – but a game management plan would solve a lot of this, right? <br />I mean all this invasive species stuff – and DLNR will not, will not say is the pig <br />an invasive species or are they not? Malama Solomon will not say if the pig <br />invasive species or isn’t it. Right? No, but a game management plan forces the <br />state to say the pig, the sheep, the goat, the axis deer, the game bird is a <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.