Laserfiche WebLink
Merit Board of Appeals May 21, 2014 <br />procedures would become null and void and they would be operating under a <br />single County -wide internal complaint procedure. <br />Mr. Toriano stated that it makes sense to give the employee a choice. In a <br />situation like this where it's an open recruitment and there are applicants from <br />outside of the County, the employee would be able to choose which tract they'd <br />want to pursue—grievance or the Merit Appeals Board. <br />Mr. Hermes reiterated Ms. Toriano's point that, in the past, their department has <br />advised that the distinguishing factor depends upon what the recruitment vehicle <br />is. In looking at the collective bargaining agreements, the controlling or related <br />language is "promotions." In this case, the County Clerk's office elected to <br />conduct an open recruitment worldwide. In the past opinions of previous <br />Administrations, it was felt that the most appropriate appeal venue would be the <br />internal complaint procedure culminating in an appeal with the Merit Appeals <br />Board. <br />Mr. Hermes stated that the reason for that was the concept of "recruitment and <br />examination," which is the subject matter under the jurisdiction of the Merit <br />Appeals Board. It was a little more generic and global to the issue of a non - <br />selection when competing against people from all over—not just within our <br />particular jurisdictional civil service system. Conversely, if this was an internal <br />promotion within the County Clerk's office, more than likely our answer would <br />have been different and more aligned with the grievance procedure. In the <br />scheme of things, it seemed to make sense as they try to decipher cases day-to- <br />day—but, it's a matter of opinion. <br />Ms. Noda said she thinks part of the confusion is that the Appellant refers to it as <br />a "promotion," so that would put it within the collective bargaining agreement. <br />She concurred with Mr. Hermes because if there was an applicant for this same <br />position, say, from Florida, that applicant would have the same opportunity to <br />appeal their non -selection, thus everyone in that applicant pool should be using <br />the same vehicle to appeal. <br />Ms. Rabago stated that she somewhat agreed and disagreed. The Merit Appeals <br />Board is here for recruitment, whether internal or external. If they're questioning <br />their qualifications and they're deemed ineligible, they can come to the Board, or <br />if for any reason they think that everything wasn't considered that should have <br />been considered, they can come to the Board. But, if they're applying for a <br />position, which in this case is a promotion from a Clerk I to a Clerk II position, <br />people from the outside could come here as this would be the proper procedure <br />for them because they're not civil service employees. But, for this particular <br />person, Ms. Torres, the proper path to follow is the grievance procedure. <br />Page 4 <br />