Laserfiche WebLink
of the Shoreline Setback Rule? Also again, no. The purpose of the Shoreline Setback Rule is to <br />protect the shoreline from inappropriate manmade structures or improvements, and there is clear <br />evidence that coastal erosion and accretion is occurring in Kona Bay Estates; therefore, it wouldn’t <br />be prudent to continue to permit swimming pools in the shoreline setback area. The best alternative <br />would be to leave the property in the shoreline setback area in its current condition. <br /> <br />And just to show you some of the evidence of coastal erosion and accretion in the Kona Bay Estates <br />area, and this property in particular, this is a photo that was taken during a 2003 storm event. You <br />can see the sea far out here, and then this is the rocky ledge area, and then this area here is where <br />you saw the sand in previous photos. This is the public access rock wall, and it looks like the photo <br />was taken from the deck of the house, so you can see storm wave water is coming over the rock <br />wall into the property. This is a view looking south; again, you have the rock wall here, and then <br />this is where currently there is a naupaka hedge, and then this is the area of the proposed pool. And <br />just to give you some examples of how coastal processes are actively working in this subdivision, <br />you can see that overtime, these photos were taken in May of 2013, you can see that waves come in, <br />they take sand away and then they come back, another storm comes in and it deposits the sand back; <br />so you can see there is a gap in the rock wall here between the sand and the top of the wall because <br />the sand has been pulled out. And then this photo was taken a little over a year later; you can see <br />that there is no gap, that the sea has deposited the sand back up to the top of the two-foot rock wall. <br />You can also see some sand beyond the wall. And then this is the property just to the north; you <br />can see not only depositing of sand on the property but also boulders that are likely tossed from the <br />rock ledge during strong storms. <br /> <br />That’s the end of the presentation. If there are any questions I’d be able to answer. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Commissioners, any questions or comments for staff? Thank you, Maija. Would the <br />applicant or its representative please come forward? <br /> <br />TANAKA: Aloha, Commissioner. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter <br />now before the Leeward Planning Commission? <br /> <br />REPRESENTATIVES: I do. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Thank you. If you could please introduce yourselves, starting with you, ma’am. <br /> <br />HOSMER: I’m Robin Hosmer. I’m with SCV Pools. <br /> <br />TANAKA: I’m Neal Tanaka, independent planner that works with SCV Pools. <br /> <br />ERENBERG: Steve Erenberg, SCV Pools. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Thank you. <br /> <br />TANAKA: So, Commissioner, I’d also like to make the panel know that we have Ron Terry who is <br />environmental analyst, who prepared the FEA for our shoreline setback variance, and if there is any <br />questions, please feel free to call him up, and he’ll be happy to address those. Ron, would you raise <br />your hand for me, please? Thank you. <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />