My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-09-15 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-09-15 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2021 8:34:34 AM
Creation date
10/22/2014 4:33:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – September 15, 2014 <br />in a meeting like this and say here’s the next agenda, yeah, which I think is an <br />awesome idea, to be honest with you. You know, another way to do it is, you <br />know what, we generate our three or four or five of fifteen issues whatever we <br />want to deal with and we give ‘em to Tom and Tom can pick. I kind of like the <br />public thing better – where we get all the members – the GMAC members <br />deciding hey what are the top five issues that we want to handle. And we had <br />consensus on that and we know it’s coming and everybody in the room knows it’s <br />coming for next meeting. So I guess here’s a couple different ways to skin that <br />cat, yeah, one is at the end of every meeting we have a discussion to say what’s <br />the next agenda, right? There may be some standing things that we’re gonna talk <br />about, yeah, but that guy that talked about, you know, Tree Planting Road, right, <br />if that’s a hot one for Kau then we make a decision as a group that’s gonna be at <br />October’s meeting. All I would say is the other way to do it is have your list of five <br />or six, right, and since we can’t talk amongst ourselves on email, we give ‘em to <br />Tom and Tom picks, right? Two separate ways to solve that problem, but if <br />you’re asking me, I kinda like the end of every meeting what’s on the next <br />agenda, right? <br /> <br />K. De Coito: Exactly. <br /> <br />M. Bartell: I prefer it that way. <br /> <br />K. De Coito: Same here… <br /> <br />W. Camara: OK. So now can I move to permanently have a district report on the <br />agenda? So each district has a moment to give a report whether they have one <br />or not. They can say so at this meeting and have time for that. <br /> <br />\[Discussion\] <br /> <br />C. Masuda: I think what the motion – from what the discussion sounds like – is <br />a motion to have permanently on the agenda, a section in the agenda, where <br />representatives from each of the districts can raise issues that they want to talk <br />about on the next agenda. That way notification is given and they can say that <br />we want DLNR present to answer this, or the police here to answer that, and <br />then as a group, you folks decide at the end of the meeting, you know, cause this <br />will come through the end of the meeting anyway, OK, we’re gonna put this on <br />the agenda from District 1 we’re gonna put this item, from District 2 we’re gonna <br />put this item, from District 3 we’re gonna put these two items because the body – <br />GMAC as a body decides that these two are very important items for the entire <br />County. I think that’s what you folks are looking at. <br /> <br />K. De Coito: See but now it’s like it’s not a Willie-Joe’s issue. <br /> <br />C. Masuda: Yeah. <br /> <br /> 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.