My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-09-10 Board of Ethics Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2014
>
2014-09-10 Board of Ethics Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2014 9:35:38 AM
Creation date
11/6/2014 9:35:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
because I’ve had a lot of issues. My properties been vandalized. <br />The locks were cut on my gate to release my livestock. They cut <br />my fences. They threw dead animals in my yard. They defaced the <br />County, our water tank at the Community Center. Vulgarity you <br />cannot imagine. So people are afraid to come forward. <br /> <br />Ms. MacDonald: May I speak for just a second? I did, although I did not personally <br /> testify, I did submit a letter. <br /> <br />Mr. Balsis: Okay. <br /> <br />Mr. Adams: Just to clarify. The items, the activities that you just spoke about, <br /> you’re not bring that in as issues against Mr. Henkel? Those <br /> things that occurred. <br /> <br />Ms. Tita: The damages to myself. No, no I’m just going to tell how <br /> contentious and how afraid people are to come forward. <br /> <br />Mr. Adams: Okay. <br /> <br />Ms. Balsis: The reason that I had asked the question about people, the people <br /> who were speaking, was to get an idea if you were singled out or <br /> something like that. <br /> <br />Ms. Tita: I see. <br /> <br /> Ms. Schoen: Mr. Chair, just for the record, the respondent did correspond <br /> with our office, and said that he was unable to attend today’s <br /> hearing because he is on Planning Commission business, and he <br /> did submit a response which you all should have in your <br /> packet. Margaret did you want to say anything to the Board? <br /> Margaret Masunaga is the attorney for Planning Commission or <br /> I’m sorry, or Planning Department? Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> Ms. Masunaga: Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> Ms. Schoen: So also for the record, and the Petitioner’s information, what the <br /> Board does today is it is doing an initial review of the petition, and <br /> deciding whether or not, what it wants to do with the petition, <br /> whether it will go forward or not. So that’s what they are doing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Balsis: You mentioned that Mr. Henkel had stated that Ms. Kawauchi was <br /> a liar. <br /> <br /> Ms. Tita: That’s correct. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.