Laserfiche WebLink
<br />that are available to assist the agencies in identifying general characteristics of these affected <br />properties without having to physically inspect each and every single proposed subdivision site. <br /> <br />As part of the Director’s unfavorable recommendation offered to you, the Director did make a <br />suggestion that the Code, the Subdivision Code be amended to require that the preliminary plat <br />map be prepared by a licensed surveyor whereas currently, the Code does not require it. <br />However, in the Commission, in its action back in April, did forward an unfavorable <br />recommendation--both Leeward and Windward Planning Commission--to the County Council <br />but did not include the Director’s suggestion on amending the Code to require a licensed <br />surveyor to prepare the preliminary plat. <br /> <br />The Council basically is offering the current Bill 266 to help address those concerns that were <br />expressed which originally mandated a site inspection of every application, and Bill 266 <br />basically takes upon the Director’s suggestion to you back in April that the Code be amended to <br />require a licensed surveyor to prepare that preliminary plat map. Bill 266 also would increase <br />the number of copies provided to the Department from eight to ten copies and to specify that it is <br />surveyor that would—a licensed surveyor that would prepare the plan, not an engineer. <br /> <br />So, just to give you a little bit of background of why we think this alternative, Bill 266, is a much <br />better alternative than the previous Bill 182 is because in 2012, we had 67 subdivision <br />applications submitted to the Department, consolidation applications 22; 2013 that number <br />increased to 92 subdivision applications with consolidation applications counting for 29 of them; <br />and as of today’s date, we have 93 subdivision applications submitted and about 18 consolidation <br />actions. <br /> <br />To give you also another perspective, back in the mid-2000’s I believe, subdivisions alone, we <br />were running close to 250 applications, so you can guess as to the effort that would be needed by <br />the Department if we were mandated to site inspect every single project site. So, we believe 266 <br />is a reasonable compromise and for that reason, the Director is recommending that the <br />Commission send a favorable recommendation of Bill 266 to the County Council. <br /> <br />With that, I stand ready to answer any questions you may have. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Commissioners, any questions? I have a question. Even with surveyor’s drawing <br />for the preliminary, it goes through, the applicant is still not obligated to do that exact plan. Is <br />that correct? <br /> <br />ARAI: Could you repeat that, I’m sorry. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Even with the surveyor’s certified drawing, once he gets approved, he still can <br />move things around. It’s just a preliminary. <br /> <br />ARAI: The preliminary plat will provide the general layout at which time the plat, the <br />preliminary plat is then circulated amongst various reviewing agencies such as Department of <br />Health, Department of Water Supply, Public Works, and State Department of Transportation. <br />Those agencies would then comment back to the Planning Department, and the Department <br />2 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br /> <br />